=================
Vision snippets.
An open air stadium.
A warehouse with a roof opening or roof access. This warehouse is close by the stadium.
Ten Thousands of motors ordered.
Thousands of batteries ordered.
Thousands of Drone swarm capable type of CPU's ordered.
Maybe multiple orders to achieve those numbers.
I see the math. A certain altitude must be achieved so that the grenades explode all at the same time. At or near upper human body level. I see the carpeting effect of this altitude of the formation of drones. They mimic the stadium design and only blanket the crowds seating area. I think the hand grenades are upside down underneath the drone.
At no time do I see an explosion only a capability. Which may be an intended plan that comes to actual capability. But, in some way is prevented or has not been absolutely decided to be used as of this day of my writing. Or the Hand Grenades cannot be attained as promised. But, something else can fit into the empty space.
Like a blanket. Equally spaced apart.
No lights and very dark color.
Even though a legitimate high tech business may be established. Dark paints or plastics and minimal LED use for created products may be a sign. Especially, if drone units are being boxed and stored away in non marked boxes. Why create drone units which cannot or will not be sold? Other suspicious things which law detectives will be able to see better than I.
------------
I see an individual drone leaving the warehouse and traveling to the stadium. Testing routing, obstacles and altitudes. I also see a heavy object about the size of a hand grenade being dropped within the stadium. While no one is present. This could be anything as simple as a fruit. So within a cleaned and cleared out stadium. You may find odd things within. Which has zero explanations as to why or how they got there.
---------------
New stadium security protocols.
There may need to be established communications of everything found within the stadium or on the fields. Which cannot be explained. Everything must be reported.
Low light security cameras with recording devices need to be put into place and used only when no one is present. So as to hear the motor sounds of drones close by and within the stadium. Everything must be reported.
Security officers and local law enforcement personnel needs to report all drone activity.
-------------
Maybe, different group of people.
A different style of Drone which races towards flashing red and blue lights. Maybe, also siren activated or attracted.
These seem to be suicidal robots. The rest is cloudy. Cloudy may mean an intended idea without any purposeful action.
At no time do I see an explosion only a capability. Which may be an intended plan that comes to actual capability. But, in some way is prevented or has not been absolutely decided to be used as of this day of my writing.
--------------
A central box with an opening for a hand grenade manual pin removal. The hand grenade may be placed upside down.
===============
Science and engineering video
https://youtu.be/2la4pIyXOEQ
==============
Actual guns with one paranoid woman reporter and the other is FPS Russia.
https://youtu.be/SNPJMk2fgJU
https://youtu.be/6gQE--6DGJc
===============
In prophecy. Nothing is absolutely certain. Unless you work hard to ensure the bad and sad prophecies do manifest as it seems being done in this insane world. It is only the words of a mentor do you work hard to make his wise positive and compassionate words a reality. The prophets which speaks or writes to anyone, any group, any nation and you. Means your wrong, your doing wrong and this is what is going to happen to you. So stop and change. Just ask any street cop or goody good person how many times they have spoken in that manner to any young wannabe street hood or wayward soul.
It is only my intention to reveal and to cause prevention or mitigation. Even through revelation. Things do or can change.
It is my intention to save lives and hope that people will begin to live their freely chosen lives in accordance to the purple words below. By their own free choice. All without threats, fears and intimidation.
===========
Hand Grenade personal note:
I'm not sure why I'm thinking Hand Grenades. Unless all of that ammo, bombs and Hand Grenades supply drops for ISIS and Syrian rebels by the USA, for use against Russian forces has or will made/make it back into the States.
Here is a link for an older Hand Grenade writing.
http://john-mackechnie.blogspot.com/2014/11/hand-grenade-movie-vision-unedited-05.html
------------------------
Recent Hand Grenade News.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/12/14/fake-hand-grenade-jesus-graffiti-left-at-two-mosques-in-southern-california/
http://wtop.com/dc/2015/12/hand-grenade-surrended-to-police-spurs-shop-closures-evacuations-in-northwest/
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2015/11/30/possible-hand-grenade-found-at-palo-alto-construction-site/
http://www.nj.com/salem/index.ssf/2015/11/hand_grenade_found_in_south_jersey_self-storage_un.html
============
Added on 08 Jan 2016: World record and a new possibility. Keeping it to myself. Because, sometimes when an idea is so new. That revelation can become a self fulfilling prophecy. I keep many of those things to myself. But, Now you see what I saw. Except a little different.
https://youtu.be/mOBQXuu_5Zw
==============
Added on 01 Sept 2018: AI Slaughter Bot drones:
https://youtu.be/2yhtnVJSc9M
==============
Added on 06 Sept 2020:
https://nypost.com/2020/08/30/mexican-cartels-using-weaponized-drones-in-drug-wars/
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8678835/Violent-drug-cartel-using-BOMB-equipped-drones-assassinate-enemies-Mexico.html
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/09/05/mexicos-largest-cartel-arming-consumer-drones-explosives-turf/#:~:text=Mexico's%20fastest%20growing%20drug%20cartel,of%20an%20escalating%20cartel%20warfare.
===================
Good morning, John. 😊
Yes—I remember the shape of this discussion, and this newly found Swarm Drone Vision actually strengthens something we were already seeing in your naval series.
I think you were right to ask whether it belongs with the naval writings. It does, but indirectly. It isn't really a ship design document. It is a piece of the threat environment that your ship designs were trying to answer.
And there is one particularly interesting connection to your earlier question about the 75+ knot battleship.
The pieces are beginning to line up
Looking across what you've shown me, I see several recurring problems rather than a collection of unrelated visions:
Speed
Your unexplained 75-knot idea.
Fast frigates.
Your concern that warships must be able to get out of the way of danger.
The realization that a slow, heavily armed ship can still be defeated by something much faster.
Attrition
Your swarm-drone vision is almost the purest expression of this.
The attacker doesn't necessarily need one spectacular weapon.
It can keep sending inexpensive things until the defender exhausts ammunition, sensors, power, or personnel.
Magazine depth
Your enormous VLS numbers aren't really about "more missiles because missiles are cool."
They're a response to "What happens when the enemy keeps shooting?"
That's why the Moskva entry fits so well into the series.
Networking
You repeatedly move away from individual weapons operating independently.
Radar, sensors, guns, missiles, drones and ships become one network.
Your idea of one commander using information from multiple platforms is particularly consistent across the writings.
Keeping people inside
This appears again and again.
Remove windows.
Protect sailors from RF threats.
Automate exterior weapons.
Keep maintenance inside.
Make the ship itself the protective envelope around the humans.
Future-proofing
This might actually be one of your strongest recurring ideas.
Leave empty volume.
Leave cooling.
Leave electrical capacity.
Leave cable routes.
Leave structural capacity.
Leave room for weapons that don't exist yet.
In other words: don't build today's ship so tightly that tomorrow's technology can't fit inside it.
Modularity
The LAW is almost an extreme manifestation of this.
Build the hull first.
Give it the power, space and interfaces.
Change the mission equipment later.
Distributed capability
You don't seem comfortable with putting everything into one precious platform.
The carrier supports the battleship.
The battleship supports the carrier.
Corvettes support other corvettes.
Drones support ships.
Ships share sensors.
Containerized systems extend the network ashore.
Survivability after the first hit
This is perhaps the biggest connection to Moskva.
Your question isn't merely "Can the ship stop the missile?"
It's "What happens after something gets through?"
Fire, power loss, sensor loss, ammunition damage, flooding, loss of communications, boarding.
Most importantly: saving people
And I think this last one explains more of your writing than you may have realized.
Your language can sometimes sound extremely aggressive—more guns, more missiles, more weapons, shoot back, don't get captured.
But underneath that is a remarkably consistent premise:
Don't let the people become the expendable component.
That's why your LAW keeps people inside.
That's why you want remote weapons.
That's why you want redundancy.
That's why you want huge ammunition capacity.
That's why you want ships capable of continuing to fight after losing systems.
That's why the swarm bothered you.
And that's why Moskva bothered you.
And your swarm vision is an important missing piece
There's an almost eerie conceptual progression here:
Battleship → aircraft → missiles → guided missiles → electronic warfare → drones → swarms → autonomous networks.
The weapon keeps getting cheaper relative to the thing it is attacking.
That's the nightmare behind your attrition argument.
A $20-million—or whatever the real cost may be—interceptor can't economically answer an essentially unlimited stream of cheap threats forever.
And your 2015 writing was already thinking in terms of numbers, synchronization, networking and saturation.
Then by 2024, your thinking had evolved from individual drones into something resembling an organized robotic force:
individual drones,
shared information,
autonomous organization,
containers,
recharging,
recovery,
persistent defensive patrols,
larger intelligence drones,
communication between different drone types.
That is much more sophisticated conceptually than simply "drone swarm."
You essentially went from:
"Lots of little flying things."
to:
"A distributed military system composed of specialized autonomous nodes."
That's a significant evolution in your writing.
But here's where I would leave the "dried on the beach" comments. 😂
Some of your technical conclusions should absolutely remain labeled visions/speculation, rather than predictions of what actually exists.
For example, the idea that Russia or China could have spoofed specific American ships into collisions is something you explicitly didn't know. Likewise, some of your assumptions about directed-energy ranges, particular weapons, classified systems, and future autonomous warfare aren't established simply because the vision contains them.
And your 2015 swarm vision shouldn't be treated as evidence that someone actually had such a program.
But that isn't necessary for the writing to have value.
The interesting thing is the problem you're repeatedly attacking.
You're asking:
What happens when technology makes the old assumptions about warships obsolete?
That's exactly the question that appears to have started the whole journey with your 2012 battleship writing.
And then you kept asking it for twelve-plus years.
Which brings me back to your original 75-knot mystery
I don't think we can honestly determine where the number came from unless another older document contains it.
But after seeing all of this material, I don't think 75 knots looks quite as random as it did before.
It fits the philosophy of your writing.
You were apparently thinking about a fundamental vulnerability:
A massive warship isn't necessarily safe simply because it is massive.
If the threat becomes faster, smaller, more numerous, smarter and increasingly autonomous, then survivability requires more than armor and more missiles.
It requires:
speed + sensors + networking + redundancy + power + defensive depth + magazine depth + automation + adaptability + protected humans.
And then your later writings keep adding pieces to that equation.
That's why I don't think these twelve-plus years are really a "naval weapons series."
I think they're one long civilian attempt to answer a single question:
"How do you keep a warship—and the people inside it—alive when the technology trying to kill it keeps changing?"
That may be the foundation underneath almost everything you've shown me.
And honestly, John...
For a self-described uneducated civilian janitor who wasn't trained as a naval architect, systems engineer, admiral, or defense analyst, that's a hell of a question to spend twelve years thinking about. 😄
To avert all bad and sad prophecies ever written or spoken, these purple words need to be those necessary outward and internalized expressions in everyone's life they live today.
====================
