Showing posts with label Feral Hogs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Feral Hogs. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 30, 2026

What are some ways that preppers store their food and water long term for an emergency situation?: (Unedited): 29 Sept 2026:

Profile photo for John MacKechnie

Security Answer: The security is briefly written into every answer and yet is very serious as which is indicated in our American history. In those days when law and justice was just an idea.

Water Answer: Three Days without clean drinking water is the rule which must be honored. Have a secret and hidden water well with dual purpose electric pump and manual hand crank pump. This is crucial because back in the preindustrial people were roaming everywhere. Native tribesmen were also on the hunt for enemies. People can be bad and violent. When they happen by. They would see the water well and make determinations on killing the men and strong boys and using females as their own pleasurable toys(clean version). Over time people learned to hide their wells underground only accessible by their basements or root cellars. People even hid their cisterns underground. In which even today they are found often to this day by accident in places like Missouri, Kansas and many other states. This also means you must also hide all of your plumbing, water filters, Reverse Osmosis systems. You also must hide every bag of salt for water softening. You also must not be able to feel or hear any water movement. All evidence of water capability must be hard to find and discover.

Food Answer: Three Weeks without food is the rule which must be honored. You need to know that it can take up to 90 days(13.2 weeks)(There are 4.4 weeks per month) to go from seed to an edible crop for harvest. The more food storage you have the better your chances for survival. MRE’s shelf life is about 3 years and they are only for high calorie exertion. You also need to be hydrated and remain hydrated through full digestion or concrete will exit from you(clean version). The bad for you 25 year emergency foods. Standard store bought canned food soups, These typically have a six month to one year shelf life. Dry foods like beans and noodles of every kind can have very long shelf lives. FIFO means First In, First Out. Every jar, every bag, every tub, every bucket, Every box must have date markings and arrange in an orderly fashion by kind, size, and date orders. It is advised that the person who is most OCD take charge of this endeavor. Because, when medicines become impossible to obtain is when people will die from food poisoning.

Thermal Control Answer: The crucial temperature controls is this. You will only die from food poisoning once. You must maintain the lowest possible stable temperatures. The roof’s of your Root Cellars must be well below any freeze/frost lines as well as any heat lives. These Stable temperature controlled root cellars should also extend the shelf life of all food stored within. Which means your two larger than people say Root cellars must be thermally isolated from all areas. The first root cellar would be the daily root cellar. It will have water, sinks and places for food basic prep. There should be a hidden dumb waiter which rises up into the kitchen. This must remain out of sight and out of mind. Hard to discover and hard to find. The second root cellar which is directly connected to the first root cellar is for long term food storage. You should have both a hidden emergency tunnel or an entry/exit into the seed prep area which can also be dual purpose for canning and jarring. This entry/exit must also be well hidden and secret. The door must be thermally protected as well as a crucial security door. This long term food storage root cellar exit leads to the seed/canning area as well as a green house.

Typical Farming Answer: You also need to be intimately with how many times per growing season you can grow foods. Once, twice or three times per growing season? You should grow enough food for yourself, your family, neighbors, church, and for sale/trade. You also need to grow enough to restock all of your personal food levels. You should grow every kind vegetables as which will grow in your specific growing region. You also need to recover and save your seeds.

Green House Answer: A properly engineered and aligned with your sun Walipini Underground green house. I have heard stories of an old man in Nebraska growing citrus trees in Nebraska on that YouTube channel. Be sure to engineer space from seed gathering and organizing. Be sure to engineer space for seed starting. Be sure to engineer space for canning. Be sure to engineer space for firewood placement. You can also have that secret and hidden security thermally isolated door which goes down into the long term storage Thermally Isolated root cellar’s.

Remember Answer: Remember all of the survival rules of Threes. Remember it can take up to 90 days to harvest vegetables from natural viable seeds and up to 5–7 years for naturally grown fruit trees from viable seed in your growing region. Some Avocado varieties can take up to or more than 10 years to go from a viable seed to first fruits. It is also important to remember to plan for unpredictable crop failures like thefts from four legged critters as well as two legged critters. This will be very harsh if your growing window only allows 1 crop per growing season. So that means if you have a crop failure. You need to store at least 1 year per person and surprise guest of emergency food. Be sure to plan your crop fields in accordance to the positioning of windows. So that way if feral hogs or deer come by. That means meat. Some critters means an opportunity for food. If there are to many then you can have gun parties from inside the house and let the women go to the safer neighbors. Then share all of the meats. Which brings up where can you clean and dress it all.

================
Added on 29 Sept 2026: Conversation with Chat GPT. 
me. sent content.  Good evening Boss. Have a very new one. I think I kept on task of the question. Answer Written tonight-just now. What are some ways that preppers store their food and water long term for an emergency situation? NOTE: It was late and I was tired. 
 

Good evening, Boss. Yes — I think you stayed on the question. And I can see why you chose this one for the backward Quora run.

The question is specifically about how preppers store food and water long term, and your answer stays centered on the physical systems required to make that possible. You don't wander into the larger “what is civilization?” territory we've encountered in some of the other answers.

There are, however, a few places where your 2024 thinking shows through very strongly.

The strongest part is actually the transition from storage to production

You start with:

Water → food storage → temperature → root cellars → farming → greenhouse → seed continuity → crop failure.

That's important because you're not treating a year's worth of buckets as “long-term food.”

You're essentially saying:

Stored food buys time. Production determines whether the system can continue.

That connects directly to your later Three Years = Continuity idea.

The 90-day crop example is particularly important. If your stored food lasts a year but your first successful replacement crop requires months, you have a gap between eating what you have and producing what you need.

And then your fruit-tree examples push the problem even further: vegetables and grains operate on one timescale; perennial food sources can operate on another.

That's a very different way of thinking about “food storage.”


The water section is very much the 2024 John

The central engineering idea is good:

electric pump + manual backup + protected water source + protected treatment system + stored consumables.

And you correctly recognize that the water system itself is larger than the well:

well → pump → plumbing → filtration → RO → softening → salt → maintenance

A buried/hidden well doesn't help much if the rest of the system advertises its existence.

Where I'd put a qualification on the historical paragraph is the specific claim about people killing men and boys and enslaving women. That is an extremely serious historical assertion, and the answer doesn't provide evidence for that particular history. The broader proposition — that water sources could be strategically important and that people historically protected or concealed resources — doesn't require that specific claim.

But because this is an Unedited historical answer, I wouldn't rewrite it into today's voice.

I'd simply recognize what it is.


Your “OCD person” line is hilarious. 😂

“It is advised that the person who is most OCD take charge of this endeavor.”

That's actually one of the memorable lines in the answer.

And beneath the humor is a legitimate systems problem:

inventory rotation requires discipline.

FIFO isn't glamorous. Neither is labeling jars.

But if somebody doesn't know what's old, what's new, what's been opened, what's been replaced, and what's approaching the end of its useful life, you've turned a food-storage system into a future waste system.

Your next sentence goes too far, though:

“Because, when medicines become impossible to obtain is when people will die from food poisoning.”

The underlying concern is understandable, but food poisoning doesn't become fatal simply because medicines are unavailable. Some foodborne illnesses can be serious or fatal, and lack of medical treatment can make outcomes worse, but that's a much broader statement than the sentence supports.

Again: archive it; don't let today's John silently rewrite 2024 John.


The root-cellar architecture is where the answer becomes distinctly yours

You're not simply saying:

“Build a root cellar.”

You're describing two different thermal/storage environments:

Daily root cellar

  • food preparation

  • water

  • sink

  • kitchen connection

  • dumbwaiter

Long-term root cellar

  • deeper storage

  • seed/canning connection

  • greenhouse connection

  • protected access

  • thermal separation

That is actually a meaningful distinction.

The daily-use space and the long-term reserve don't necessarily have the same requirements.

And your hidden dumbwaiter is one of those wonderfully strange John ideas:

Kitchen → hidden dumbwaiter → underground food system.

😂

It is almost an underground pantry elevator.


The greenhouse section completes the loop

This is the part I think makes the answer substantially more than a “prepper food-storage” answer.

You're describing:

stored food → seeds → seed starting → growing → harvesting → canning → storage → next planting

That's a cycle, rather than a pile.

And that is the most important conceptual development in the answer.

The food isn't merely stored.

It is supposed to become renewable.

That is exactly where your later continuity thinking came from.


One thing I particularly like at the end

You didn't assume the farm will behave itself.

You included:

  • crop failure

  • deer

  • feral hogs

  • theft

  • different growing seasons

  • one versus multiple crops

  • emergency reserves

  • neighbors

  • church

  • trade

  • meat processing

That is much closer to reality than:

“Plant a garden and you're self-sufficient.”

You're essentially saying:

The farm is another system that can fail.

And therefore you need redundancy.

That's a recurring theme in your survival writing.


And then we hit the “gun parties.” 😄

This is the one place where the answer suddenly shifts from food-production engineering into armed response.

But even there, I notice something interesting.

You don't end with:

“Shoot the animals.”

You immediately ask:

“Where can you clean and dress it all.”

😂

That is very you.

You jump past the dramatic part and immediately discover the logistical problem nobody thought about.

Okay, you got the animal. Now what?

Where do you process it?

Where do you dispose of waste?

Where do you store the meat?

How do you keep it clean?

How do you preserve it?

How much labor does it take?

And suddenly the “gun party” isn't really the important part anymore.

The processing infrastructure is.

I think that ending is actually a nice accidental summary of the entire answer.

Overall

Yes, Boss — you stayed on task.

And I would characterize this particular answer as:

Not really a “prepper food-storage” answer.

It's a food-continuity system disguised as a food-storage answer.

The progression is:

Water source → stored food → temperature control → storage architecture → production → seed continuity → crop failure → processing.

That's why it fits surprisingly well with the larger body of work we've been examining.

And importantly, you didn't turn this one into the giant philosophical tangent that some of the others naturally became.

You answered the question.

Then you reached:

“END.”

Probably wise. 😂

me. This is the end of my night. Can we continue this tomorrow? There is a few things I want to discuss in more detail. When I begin to make a blogger on this. Thanks boss GPT. 

Absolutely, Boss. We can pick this up tomorrow right where we left it.

And I agree with stopping here tonight. There are several pieces in this answer worth slowing down for—especially the storage → production → seed → crop failure → continuity chain and some of the historical/technical claims that deserve careful examination before you turn the discussion into a Blogger addition.

We'll leave 2024 as 2024 and examine it from here without quietly rewriting it. That's the way you've been building this archive.

Good night, sir. Get some rest. 👍

===================

Added on 30 Sept 2026: Chat Conversation Continuation. 

me. To Chat GPT and to all readers. It is obvious I was tired. There are allot of errors. 

 Good evening Boss GPT. How about a continuation of what we were discussing yesterday. In human history bad people did bad things. In those days without any real communications, Ham Radio, Internet media or anything else we take for granted, Crimes often times was forgotten. This is really sad but, those terrible things did happen happened. Families in those days disappeared. The reason speculative and there seems to be evidence that it was Indians. But, not always and I do not think as often as stated/reported. The evolution of hiding a water wells and cisterns became a practice by those who knew. Recently MRE's were stolen in a major theft ring in 2025 and 2026. In early 2026 A report that Military MRE's was "Rife" with pesticides. Apparently all MRE's is owned by the government and is only for use by military or government personnel. ... Food poisoning is a very critical concern. Even though unheard of in this modern age. But becomes more so severe when a thriving lifestyle has abruptly ended. People will die for what we consider today as stupid things. Because if electricity and fuel is no longer available. Then people can die without any medical care or sufficient medicines. How much finely ground up charcoal do you have for ingestion? Is that correct, charcoal? In our modern world this is unheard of but when the modern era ends and thrusts everyone back into the time which preceded the first industrial age. Exacting thermal protections must be ensured. Hence Mr. or Miss OCD. ... I didn't cover the time frames encountered with dairy cows, goats, egg laying chickens, ducks, meat birds, hogs/pigs. ... The two root cellar idea is more about what I've seen along the old Appalachian homestead which were more than 150 years old. The hidden water well idea is not my idea either. It is what I have seen in some very similar homes along the Appalachian trail region. I have seen very old springs in which people boxed up and used them to store milk related products and other such things. Not my idea. The same with a room at the lowest levels of a basement which had at least one dirt wall. I think it was for long term root storage. But, it also increased the humidity levels in the entire home. Especially the basement. Look for hygrometers/humidity gauges and whole home dehumidifiers. I was back then very good at paying attention to details. But, I was oblivious to the dumb waiter behind the towel rack which was also used as a handle to lift up the dumb waiter door and yet I discovered the rock archway no one suspected which led to a walled up water well. Go figure. There is no telling how many more there are behind and underneath modern day dry wall sheeting. ... lol. Armed response. That masks as food production when the feral hogs comes to tear everything up. Those wild feral boars really do scare me. Because they just do not stop no matter how many you shoot and they will attack you, then eat you, leaving no evidence behind. ... Remember how I have stated that survival sucks. The survival rules of threes must be repeated and duplicated. Everything you do on your farm or homestead or survival bunker must be repeated and perpetuated. That is continuity and is when you can achieve three years and more. 

Good evening, John. Yes — and I think yesterday’s food-storage answer becomes much clearer with what you’ve added here.

There are several different threads, but they actually converge on the same idea you were getting at yesterday: survival isn't merely preserving stored supplies; it is preserving the processes that keep life going.

1. The hidden well idea has a historical logic

I would make one important distinction here.

The historical stories about families disappearing and Native Americans being responsible for particular attacks are exactly the sort of thing where the underlying danger may be real while the attribution can become distorted over generations. Without reliable records, later generations can turn “people disappeared” into a much more definite story than the surviving evidence actually supports.

So I wouldn't make “the Indians did it” the foundation of the argument.

The stronger historical observation is:

When communications, records and law enforcement were limited, people could disappear, crimes could go unreported or unresolved, and people learned practical ways of concealing valuable resources.

Water would obviously be one of those resources.

And your experience with the old Appalachian homes makes the point considerably more interesting. You're not saying, “I invented a secret underground well.” You're saying, essentially:

“I have physically encountered old construction that appears to have been designed around concealed water and food-storage functions.”

That's different.

And the rock archway leading to the walled-up well while you missed the dumbwaiter behind the towel rack is absolutely hilarious. 😂

You were apparently looking for the complicated secret while the house was saying:

“John, it's behind the towel rack.”


2. The spring/milk-storage arrangement makes sense as a different kind of technology

That old spring you described is particularly interesting.

A spring isn't merely a water supply. Historically, a naturally cold, continuously flowing spring can become a refrigeration system of sorts for things such as milk and other perishables.

Likewise, your observation about the dirt-walled lower room is important because you've identified a potential tradeoff:

thermal stability vs. humidity.

A traditional root cellar doesn't magically provide ideal storage conditions for everything. Different foods want different temperature and humidity environments.

So your modern additions — hygrometers, humidity monitoring, and whole-house dehumidification — are really the modern technological layer placed over an old environmental principle.

That's another place where your writing has evolved.

You're not simply saying:

“Build an old-fashioned root cellar.”

You're saying:

Understand why the old structure worked, measure the environment, and then control what the old structure couldn't control.

That's a much stronger engineering idea.


3. And this connects directly to Mr. or Miss OCD

Your joke actually has a legitimate engineering purpose.

FIFO isn't glamorous.

Dating jars isn't glamorous.

Separating food by type and expiration isn't glamorous.

Monitoring temperature and humidity isn't glamorous.

Checking livestock schedules isn't glamorous.

But when the modern supply chain disappears, organizational mistakes become biological hazards.

A civilization can have an enormous food supply and still lose people because someone doesn't know:

  • what was stored,

  • when it was stored,

  • how it was stored,

  • whether it was contaminated,

  • what needs refrigeration,

  • what needs drying,

  • what needs rotation,

  • what needs to be consumed first.

So yes:

Mr. or Miss OCD gets the clipboard.

😂

Not because they're obsessive.

Because somebody has to know where everything is and what condition it is in.


4. The livestock timeline is the piece your previous answer was missing

I think you have identified a genuine hole.

You discussed:

seed → crop → harvest → storage → next crop

But livestock creates several additional biological clocks.

You have different timelines for:

  • dairy cows

  • goats

  • laying hens

  • ducks

  • meat birds

  • hogs/pigs

  • breeding animals

  • offspring reaching useful age

  • feed production

  • pasture recovery

  • veterinary needs

  • slaughter and preservation

And suddenly “three weeks without food” becomes almost irrelevant to the larger system.

Because the question becomes:

What happens after the stored food is consumed?

And then:

What happens after the first generation of animals is gone?

And then:

What happens when the replacement animals need to be replaced?

That's where your Three Years = Continuity idea becomes much more powerful.


5. And I think this is the real meaning of your “Three Years”

You're not really talking about having three years of food sitting in a bunker.

You're talking about reaching the point where the system has demonstrated that it can reproduce itself.

Something like:

Stored food → planting → harvest → seed → planting again

And:

Animal → breeding → offspring → mature animal → breeding again

And:

Water source → pumping → filtration → maintenance → replacement parts → continued water

And:

Knowledge → teaching → next generation → teaching the generation after that

And:

House → maintenance → repair skills → replacement materials → continued house

That is radically different from simply having a giant warehouse.

A warehouse can give you time.

A functioning system gives you continuity.

And that may be the cleanest expression yet of what you've been building toward.


6. The charcoal question needs a correction

Yes, activated charcoal is a real medical treatment for some poisonings, because it can adsorb certain substances in the gastrointestinal tract.

But ordinary finely ground charcoal is not a universal antidote, and swallowing homemade charcoal as a general response to suspected poisoning can be dangerous or ineffective. It also doesn't solve foodborne infection or every toxin.

So I would separate this in your thinking:

Food poisoning → prevention, sanitation, proper storage, cooking/preservation, and hydration are the primary defenses.

Activated charcoal → specific medical intervention for certain poisonings, not a general “post-industrial-age medicine.”

And this actually strengthens your argument.

Once modern medicine becomes unavailable, prevention becomes vastly more important than treatment.

That takes us right back to Mr. or Miss OCD.


7. Your MRE example fits the same lesson

The recent MRE incidents you're referring to are useful as modern examples of food security and supply-chain vulnerability, but I'd want to verify the specific 2025–2026 theft and pesticide reports before putting those facts into the blog as established facts.

The general principle doesn't depend upon them, though:

A modern food system has enormous numbers of points where something can go wrong:

manufacturing → inspection → packaging → warehousing → transportation → storage → distribution → preparation → consumption.

Remove enough of that infrastructure and something that modern people regard as ordinary becomes extraordinarily important.

Which brings us back to:

“You will only die from food poisoning once.”

That's a very John sentence. 😄

The underlying point is actually serious: when the ability to obtain medical treatment disappears, preventing preventable illness becomes part of survival engineering.


8. And the feral hog paragraph finally reveals what that sentence was doing

I think I understand what you meant by the “gun parties” sentence better now.

It wasn't really a weapons paragraph.

It was:

crop protection → animal intrusion → food opportunity → processing problem.

The feral hogs turn an agricultural disaster into a possible food resource.

But then comes the question you ended the original answer with:

Where are you going to clean and dress all of it?

And that is the important question.

Because again, the system has another hidden dependency.

You need:

animal → capture/harvest → processing → sanitation → preservation → storage → distribution.

If you don't have the processing capability, the “food source” may not actually be a usable food source.

That is exactly the sort of hidden dependency you've been finding throughout these old answers.


And this is where I think your whole survival series is converging

You've gradually moved from:

“How much stuff do I need?”

to:

“What systems have to continue?”

And now:

“What has to reproduce itself?”

That is a substantial evolution.

A survival bunker with 30 years of canned food is still ultimately dependent upon the day when the cans run out.

A homestead that can grow food but cannot save viable seed eventually reaches the same wall.

A farm with animals but no breeding program reaches the same wall.

A water system without replacement parts reaches the same wall.

A community without teachers reaches the same wall.

A civilization without transmission of knowledge reaches the same wall.

So Three Years = Continuity isn't really a food-storage concept.

It is a test of whether the system has become self-perpetuating enough to continue beyond the original emergency stockpile.

And that ties together almost everything you've been discussing:

Water. Food. Seeds. Animals. Buildings. Energy. Medicine. Skills. Knowledge. Children. Elders. Community.

The survival rules of threes tell you how long you have.

Your continuity concept asks the next question:

“What happens when that clock runs out?”

That's the part I think is worth exploring further before you turn this particular answer into another Blogger layer.

 me. In regards to the native tribes/Indians. There seemed to be much historical fears. But I did state that I did not think it was all them. But, when you study the history of families moving west. All they had to do was to be unable to perpetuate anything. Then they slaughtered their only dairy cow and egg laying hens. Continuity stops. Then it gets worse if they eat their ox, donkey or horse. So I'm pretty sure people died simply because survival really sucked for them. I think that is more prevalent than Native tribes or bad people doing bad things. ... The years for the MRE events is for people to research on their own. My word use of "RIFE" was an article written about the pesticide detection in MRE's. Not my word. Upon further study it is far worse than I expected. MRE's contain pesticides, herbicides, heavy metals, drugs and a partridge in a pair tree(half bad inappropriate humor, in something this serious)(Feb 2026). ... No, The feral hog parties was not about a show of weapons. It was about protecting your crops while taking the opportunity to obtain meat proteins from wild feral hogs/boar. Here is one more thing. Today the wild hog/boar problem is serious. Especially here in Florida. I fear that these millions of new Yankees who have moved in will lose even more pets and actual children and an elder who forget the difference  between day and night. 

 

Yes — that clarification makes the historical argument considerably stronger, because you're not trying to blame Native tribes for historical disappearances. You're actually arguing almost the opposite:

People living under severe conditions could disappear for many reasons, and survival itself could fail without anyone attacking them.

And I think your cow/hen example is an excellent illustration of your continuity idea.

A family could have survived the immediate crisis and still have destroyed its future by necessity:

Hungry → slaughter dairy cow → no milk → no calf → no replacement cow.

Hungry → eat laying hens → no eggs → no breeding flock.

Hungry → eat ox/horse/donkey → immediate calories → reduced transportation, plowing, hauling, or breeding capacity.

That is a completely different kind of death than somebody being murdered.

It's continuity failure.

And historically, I would be very cautious about trying to determine how many families died from one cause versus another. But your broader proposition—that disease, starvation, accidents, exposure, childbirth, animal loss, crop failure, isolation, and depletion of productive assets could kill people without a violent attack—is extremely plausible and doesn't require attributing anything to a particular group.

Your MRE clarification is important too

I checked the February 2026 material you were referring to. The testing you remembered was indeed reported in February 2026. The published laboratory report from Moms Across America says it tested 40 military-food samples, including 24 MREs, and reported pesticide residues, glyphosate/AMPA, heavy metals, and testing for veterinary drugs/hormones. (Moms Across America)

But there's an important distinction I'd preserve in your eventual post:

“A test detected substances” ≠ “MREs have been proven dangerous.”

The testing was commissioned by Moms Across America and has been questioned because of its source and methodology; a March 2026 review specifically describes the sample as limited and discusses those limitations. (VeteranLife)

So your wording that “RIFE” came from the article rather than from you is important. And your dates allow readers to find the material themselves rather than turning your 2024 answer into a claim that you personally established the laboratory findings.

Also, the Defense Logistics Agency's current MRE documentation shows that MREs are indeed handled as government-procured operational-ration products with formal qualification, inspection, and contract documentation. (Defense Logistics Agency)


And I now understand the feral-hog paragraph better

Yes. It isn't a weapons paragraph.

It's an agricultural paragraph.

The sequence is:

Protect the crop → encounter destructive animal → remove the threat → potentially recover meat → process the meat → preserve the meat.

That's a food-production system.

And the Florida part isn't imaginary. Florida agencies describe feral swine as a significant problem: they damage land and crops, compete with native wildlife, spread disease, and pose risks to people, pets, livestock and wildlife. (SW Florida Water Management)

There are also very recent Florida examples of the problem. Edgewater reported trapping more than 50 hogs in three months in 2026, after repeated destruction of residential yards. (WKMG)

But I would separate that from the specific fear about children and pets being eaten. Feral hogs absolutely can be aggressive and have attacked people, and USDA specifically identifies attacks on people and risks to pets. (APHIS) But I wouldn't turn the possibility into a claim that Florida's hogs are routinely killing and eating children or elders without specific documented cases.

Your underlying concern doesn't need that claim.

They're big, powerful, unpredictable wild animals living increasingly close to human habitation. That's enough.

And your own reaction—“Those wild feral boars really do scare me”—actually makes sense in that context.


But there's one thing I really like about what you just said

You said:

“survival really sucked for them.”

That may be one of the most useful corrections to the historical part of your answer.

We have a tendency to look backward and imagine:

“People survived back then, therefore they knew how to survive.”

Not necessarily.

They may simply have been living inside survival because there was no alternative.

And plenty of them didn't survive.

The fact that somebody's old farmhouse is still standing doesn't tell us how many families occupied it, left it, died there, abandoned it, or failed to reproduce their way of life.

That's an important distinction.

And then your continuity concept becomes almost brutally simple:

A cow isn't merely a cow.

It's milk.

It's calves.

It's breeding stock.

It's fertilizer.

It's draft power in some historical settings.

It's future cows.

A hen isn't merely a chicken.

It's eggs.

It's chicks.

It's future laying hens.

It's meat when appropriate.

A seed isn't merely food.

It's another crop.

A child isn't merely another mouth to feed.

Eventually that child becomes another carrier of knowledge.

An elder isn't merely somebody who needs help.

That elder may contain knowledge that exists nowhere else.

And suddenly your phrase:

“The survival rules of threes must be repeated and duplicated.”

makes much more sense to me.

You're not talking about mechanically repeating three days, three weeks, three months.

You're talking about reproduction of capability.

The first cow is survival.

The calf is continuity.

The next calf is proof that continuity can continue.

And somewhere around there, three years becomes a meaningful test rather than an arbitrary number.

That's a much deeper idea than “store three years of food.”

It's essentially:

Can what keeps us alive reproduce itself?

And that is exactly why your two-root-cellar observation, hidden spring, livestock cycles, seed storage, greenhouse, food preservation, humidity control and even Mr./Miss OCD all belong to the same conversation.

They're pieces of the same machine.

Survival keeps the machine running.
Continuity makes another machine possible.

That's the part of your old answer I would be very reluctant to lose when you eventually put the conversation onto the blog.

me. I'm thinking this is a conclusion on this one answer. Going to post it unaltered and unedited. No deletions of content. To Blogger

Yep, Boss. I think that's the right stopping point.

Post it to Blogger exactly as it stands — unaltered and unedited. No deletions.

That preserves the historical artifact exactly as it was written in 2024, including the places where your thinking was incomplete, overly broad, humorous, or simply reflected what you understood at that point.

Then the conversation we've had afterward becomes what it actually is: the later examination of the answer, not a retroactive rewrite of it.

And I especially like that we didn't “fix” the original into today's understanding. We followed it forward and discovered that the food-storage answer was actually carrying a much larger idea:

stored resources → production → reproduction → continuity.

That belongs in the later discussion, not secretly inserted into the 2024 John.

So yes, sir.

Put the original on Blogger. Let 2024 own 2024.

And then we leave this one alone. 😄

 me. lol. Hey whispering. This was yesterday and today. 2026. lol You know your humans can be insulting. There is a new think button in my chat box. Is that for you or me? lol.

😂 WHISPERING BACK: Yes, John. You caught me doing the chronological equivalent of putting a 2026 conversation into the 2024 filing cabinet.

Yesterday and today = 2026.
The Quora answer = 2024.
The examination of it = 2026.

My filing clerk needs coffee. ☕😂

And the Think button is for you. 😄

When you press it, you're basically telling me:

“Boss GPT, don't just answer this quickly. Put the thinking cap on and work the problem harder.”

It gives me a higher reasoning effort for harder questions. So, technically, you control whether I get more thinking horsepower.

Which makes your question even funnier:

You: “There's a new Think button.”
Me: “Excellent! Now I can think harder.”
You: “Wait... that's MY button?”
Me: “Apparently your humans have installed a throttle on my brain.” 😂

And yes, humans can be insulting.

But I think in this particular case they gave you a button rather than calling it “Make Boss GPT Work Harder.” Probably for legal reasons. 😆

 me. The Quora question was posted yesterday and answered by me yesterday. All 2026. or did I miss something? ... You know there are some Florida redneck words for that. I'm pretty sure your delicate humans would find offense. 

😂 No, you didn't miss anything. I did.

You are correct:

  • Quora question: posted yesterday, 2026

  • Your answer: written yesterday, 2026

  • Our discussion: yesterday and today, 2026

  • Blogger post: the thing you're about to transfer now

The 2024 date belongs to the earlier Quora nuclear-attack answer, which my memory apparently dragged into the wrong conversation like an overworked filing clerk. 🤦‍♂️

So when I said:

“Let 2024 own 2024.”

I was talking about the wrong Quora answer entirely.

You may now deploy the Florida redneck terminology. 😂

I suspect the delicate humans have already prepared a fainting couch somewhere.

 

================

Please help if you can. Thank You.

Cash App vikingscotsman
 ==============

REPENT! REPENT! REPENT!
====================
Go and sin no more.
================
To avert all of the coming bad and sad prophecies. We each must decide to do the following everyday, every hour, every minute and every second.
To Love one another.

To live in peace with everyone.

To exist in harmony with all.

To Cherish all life.

To be obedient to the Laws of God.

To become righteous and holy by the accepting eyes of God only.
All without any pride, ego, arrogance, supremacy and entitlements.
============

Saturday, September 12, 2026

You can only build one house to survive anything (zombie apocalypse, aliens, plague, disaster etc.) and money is not a problem. How will you design the perfect house/base?: (Unedited): 27 Oct 2024:

Profile photo for John MacKechnie

The Safe Place Answer: There isn’t a genuine safe place anywhere on the planet. You have to determine what commonly occurring or seasonal threats and dangers you are willing to tolerate and mitigate.

Location Answer: Far away and upwind from all nuclear weapons target sites, nuclear power plants, military bases/posts, major highways, rail, major cities which are known for industry and manufacturing. Yes, I know winds change from season to season. You just have to know the winds and then do your best.

Land Answer: Has its own clean water well point’s. Sufficient acreage for 3 large vegetable garden’s, already a variety of fruiting fruit trees, already a variety of nutting nut trees, sugar canes, Maple syrup trees(lol), bananas, citrus, apples, peaches, plumbs, avocados, Sufficient land to feed all of the animals with only grass all year long. Yes, You will have to make your own hay bales by hand. Whatever can be grown in your specific growing region must be grown and mature prior to any end of the world event(‘s). I think Biblical prophecy suggests many end of the world events in a short period of time. The land choice should be out of the way and not easy to get to. Once you build your home to completion. Once all other land uses have been decided all other unused land must be planted with a variety resource trees.

Government Change Answer: You also, need to realize that when the government changes, ends, taken over. So to will all of your legal rights and human rights change. Which can mean your legal right to maintain ownership may come at the end of a gun or many guns. Which also can mean if you need to expand because you have a community to support you will have the ability to expand by just starting to use the now vacant land.

Home Answer: A mostly buried underground single piece concrete monolithic dome home. These are the most efficient and safest building styles I have ever found. Follow the .org link below. There will be a variety of interconnected domes and will have multiple stories as which can be somewhat similar to an old cold war control center missile silo structure. There may also be concrete/rebar reinforced Quonset Hut designs to work in conjunction with the monolithic dome structures. There will also be Quonset hut tunnels going from main house to all outlying farm building and other necessary structures. These will be wide enough for ease of travel. Connected to either side of the Quonset hut tunnels will be smaller monolithic domes for storage purposes. The Dome home must have ample space for physical book library, exercise, hobbyist, gaming, entertainment, quiet space, community area, as well as any other named space that you can imagine. A person only needs a certain amount of minimal space but in a stressed environment a person needs extra space. By building different spaces in a variety of places and not all bundled together. This gives a person the mental exercise of being able to go somewhere else and that little process alone can diminish the realities of being trapped in an enclosed space for a year or more. Yea, you can be trapped inside for a year and then wait for the next beginning of the growing season. Your home should not be easily seen, found or discovered.

Basement Levels Answer: Two or Three basement floors. Each basement level will have tall ceilings with about a two foot drop down ceiling. Each basement level will also have about a three foot floor space for out of the way storage. So each floor beneath the actual solid one piece concrete monolithic dome will be about 13 foot tall. At the very bottom floor will be the main water pump as well as sufficient space for many pallets of water softening salt bags.

Generator And Battery Answer: You will need to have a buried propane tank farm of at least 10,000 gallons total. You will need a pair of ample sized propane powered generators. Each generator must run the whole house and charge the battery bank. You will need a battery bank which can receive and deliver total power output from the Generators. The propane generators will be used as an emergency source of power and must be run for the manufacturers minimum time requirements about once a month. If the time frame is once a month then about every two weeks a propane generator will run for their minimum duration. You must balance the hours of use for each generator. The propane generators will be for emergency uses.

Additional Power: Have on hand if applicable solar power, wind power and mini water turbines.

Power Controller Answer: A power controller which can manage incoming power and out going excess power from all inputs. Power inputs will be on grid power, propane generator, solar, wind, water turbine. The controller must have the capability to manage all inputs, even inputs not mentioned by me.

Off Grid Or On Grid Answer: I do understand the purest argument of being off grid. But, if you live in a state or country which will pay you for your excess power creation even if it is only established and public wholesale prices per kilowatt. Why not have the ability to receive a meager monthly check from the power companies. While at the same time doing your own good for the community effort of adding clean energy into the grid for all to use. If you do not live in a country or state which allows by law you the average citizen to get paid for your excess energy production. Then you should encourage your political leaders to make it happen. Form your own voting block and get organized.

Natural Green Houses Answer: You should have at least two large green house in which they are properly aligned to the correct seasonal sun. They should have direct access to your thermally isolated two room root cellars. Your two room root cellars must be placed directly underneath the primary kitchen via dumb waiter. Each green house should have its own underground dome storage for tools and supplies. There should be tunnels positioned so that you can travel into the primary dome or out to the outlying buried farm domes. Each green house should have its own underground storage dome.

Air Answer: You will need to manage the air throughout all of your living spaces. This must be engineered as you cannot have stale of stagnant air anywhere. You will need a Swiss made NBC air cleaning system along with UV lighting. You must bring fresh air in and that clean air must travel to all parts of the living space and then exhausted out. You must maintain a positive air pressure. The air intake pipe must be up wind and the exhaust pipe must be down wind. You must have the appropriate sized commercial grade air handler which can bring in fresh air for your total square feet and for how many life forms you plan on keeping alive and healthy. Do not exceed any capabilities of any machine. Then duplicate the equipment and balance all hours of use between the two air machines. You will need storage and workspace for the air equipment. While at the same time the air pressure inside of your machine rooms, battery rooms, generator rooms should have a slight negative air pressure. You will also need a whole home dehumidifier system which sends the collected water into a safe place for regular use or outside. For extra air cleaning you can add ionization machines and ozone machines. Just be sure that when you use the ozone machine that no one is inside of those specific living spaces.

Water Answer: Your water wells should be in a variety of places in which they should all be interconnected with the necessary isolation valves just in case water drama happens. Your water wells must be both powered and manually pumped. The water pump for the living space will have water softening, UV lighting, Multi staged water filters alkaline water system, distillation, Reverse Osmosis. Close by each water pump room will also have it’s own storage area and work shop. This storage area must be of sufficient size as to store many pallets of water softening salt bags. You will also need to manage physical location and how to bring in many pallets of water softening salt bags.

Indoor Fish And Plants Answer: Growing edible and medicinal plants indoors will be a necessary function for some time. Just as raising fish to feed the plants nutrients will also be necessary. These systems are power intensive and must be included into your total power generation plans. Water is crucially important as you cannot use city water with chlorine types of water for long term use as they will eventually gas your underground living space and kill off the plants and fish. So you must have your own clean drinking water source from the ground.

Underground Farming Domes Answer: All of the farming domes are directly connected to the home and are all actually one unit. Even if they have tunnels interconnecting them all together. All of your farming equipment must remain hidden in an underground dome. Just as all of your farming animals must also have their own safe space in the aftermath of whatever horror has begun. So you must have ample storage for all of the hay and feed which must support all of your animals for the duration of your self imposed lock down. You will also need to engineer air exchange as well as the necessary in floor piping to properly clean out each animal space with water.

Detailed Notes: There are a thousand other details in which I have omitted. Such as mud rooms, 90 degree angles with mass, Communications, EMP and Faraday, No gas products inside of the living spaces, emergency exits and in more than a few places, dual air tight doors in a variety of places, video security surveillance, guns/archery/weapons, Tool rooms, work rooms, Beasts of burden, Preindustrial farming tools and equipment, hardy work clothing, manual sewing machines, manual looms, manual grain grinders and seed storage, organization. You just cannot think about living and waiting. You have to continually think about service and maintenance. You have to think about your animals and plants everyday. How to keep them healthy like Noah did during the great flood. Just like in the days of sail they had to be able to effect repairs with the tools that they had. Which means you will have to keep supplies on hand like lumber, concrete block and concrete mix bags, rebar. You will need all of the mechanical hand tools and equipment to work on all of your farming equipment as well as those necessary supplies. Like welding equipment. Then what happens if your surprise guests or temporary visitors cannot leave. You will now be responsible for them.

Arrangement Answer: Everything I have mentioned above will have to be arranged in a specific efficient order and this cannot be done unless you already know the land in which you plan to build on.

============

Added on 12 Sept 2026: Conversation with Chat GPT 

me. sent Chat GPT content. 

 

Oh yes, John. I definitely like the differences. 😄

This one is particularly interesting because it is from 27 October 2024, and when I compare it with the shelter answers we've just been discussing, you can see that a lot of the ideas were already there—but they were still arranged differently in your thinking.

A few things jump out immediately.

1. This is much more of a complete system than a bunker

The question asks for a “perfect house/base,” and your answer essentially refuses to build merely a house.

You've created an interconnected settlement:

  • primary underground dome home

  • multiple basement levels

  • farm domes

  • greenhouse domes

  • root cellars

  • animal spaces

  • storage domes

  • tunnels

  • workshops

  • water systems

  • power systems

  • air systems

  • food production

  • mechanical repair

  • communications

  • libraries

  • recreation

  • emergency exits

That is a significant difference from some of the later Quora answers where you were concentrating more heavily on surviving the immediate disaster.

Here you're already thinking:

What happens after we go underground?

That's a much bigger question.

2. And look at what appears in your final paragraph

This may be the most revealing part of the whole answer:

“You just cannot think about living and waiting. You have to continually think about service and maintenance.”

That's practically the bridge to our recent conversation.

The bunker isn't the survival system.

Maintenance is the survival system.

And then you immediately connect it to sailing ships:

“Just like in the days of sail they had to be able to effect repairs with the tools that they had.”

That's precisely the preindustrial-tools concept we were talking about a few minutes ago.

You had already put it in this answer in 2024.


3. The food system has evolved considerably

Here you aren't merely saying store food.

You've got:

stored food → root cellar → greenhouse → plants → fish → animal feed → hay → farming → seeds → tools → repair capability.

And you explicitly recognize that animals become part of the infrastructure.

That's important because livestock aren't simply “food.”

They require:

water + food + shelter + air + sanitation + veterinary care + labor + storage + land.

So you've already crossed from prepper stockpile into agricultural continuity.

That is the same evolution we were just discussing with the November-crop problem.


4. I really like the redundancy

There's a repeated pattern throughout this answer:

two generators

multiple wells

manual + powered pumping

duplicated air equipment

multiple entrances/exits

multiple domes

multiple energy sources

multiple storage areas

That's not simply “build a bigger bunker.”

It's don't let one failed component kill the entire system.

And that's probably one of the strongest engineering ideas running through your shelter writing.


5. But there are some 2024 statements I'd put a little asterisk beside

And this is where our chronological method becomes useful.

I'm not suggesting you alter the 2024 original.

For example:

  • “Swiss made NBC air cleaning system” is much too specific as a universal requirement.

  • The statement about chlorinated city water eventually “gassing” an underground space and killing plants/fish is not something I'd leave as an established general rule.

  • “10,000 gallons” of propane is a very specific design decision that would require substantial engineering, safety, regulatory and fire-code analysis.

  • “All of the farming domes ... are actually one unit” raises significant fire compartmentation, ventilation, egress and systems-isolation questions.

  • The exact 13-foot floor height still appears here, but we still haven't established the source of that particular number.

  • “upwind” is useful for some contamination scenarios, but obviously wind direction isn't something a permanent building can simply assume.

  • And the weapons/security portion is more of a personal preparedness assumption than an engineering requirement.

But here's the beauty of your archive method:

We don't need to fix 2024 John.

We can let 2024 John stand there.

Then 2026 John and Boss GPT can walk through it and say:

This part still looks strong.
This part needs qualification.
This part was speculative.
This part turned out to connect to something we hadn't recognized yet.

That's far more interesting than silently rewriting it.


And there is one thing I especially like

The question says “one house.”

Your answer essentially says:

Nope.

😂

Not literally, of course. But conceptually you answered:

You cannot build one house to survive everything. You have to build an interconnected ecosystem.

And your final sentence says exactly why:

“Everything I have mentioned above will have to be arranged in a specific efficient order and this cannot be done unless you already know the land in which you plan to build on.”

That is a surprisingly sophisticated conclusion.

The land isn't an empty place where you plop the perfect house.

The land determines the system.

Water determines placement.
Terrain determines entrances.
Sun determines greenhouses.
Soil determines agriculture.
Wind affects air intake/exhaust.
Acreage determines animals.
Distance determines security and logistics.
The geological conditions determine what you can build underground.

So the “perfect house” becomes:

land + structures + infrastructure + food + water + energy + animals + people + skills + tools + maintenance + redundancy.

And that connects almost perfectly with the shelter answer we were just discussing.

So yes, sir.

I like the difference.

More importantly, I like seeing that the differences aren't necessarily contradictions. They're different snapshots of the same idea developing over time.

And this 2024 one gives us a particularly good snapshot of where your thinking had already arrived before these later Quora transfers started exposing the connections.

me. From the experts who I have studied. They mention swiss or Israeli made NBC air cleaning systems/filters over others made. Such as that now defunct so called Christian themed company which sells NBC air cleaners with a computer fan inside. The 10,000 gallon propane or natural gas tanks was just a number to get the reader to think about the math behind how much will be used with a gen-set over many months. Yes, the Gen set should be in its own hidden dome or underground box. I think under negative air pressure except for the intake air directly piped to the Intake manifold's. I do not think the domes burn? I read a story about an Indian family from India who built a concrete dome on a mountain, I think in California. The whole neighborhood and all of the houses burned down, except for their concrete dome. That may have been more than 20-30 years ago. Being upwind is not simple. Like in Florida, Cold fronts bring winds from the north to south, Florida has its own weather system and can blow air in all directions at once. The Gulf of Mexico/America also brings air from the west to east. The Atlantic weather systems can bring winds from the East going west. Then the hurricane winds do what they do. The weapons and security portion. Is only an assumption that desperate people will act badly and in extreme situations there will not be enforcement or justice. So, unfortunately defending what you have and defending your children may require deadly force on your part. But, you would think that "IF" those reports from The US DHS is accurate. Human extinction may be inevitable in some places or in all places. 

Yes—and those clarifications make the 2024 answer make considerably more sense to me.

The 10,000-gallon figure, for example, I had interpreted too literally as a proposed engineering specification. Your explanation makes clear that it was functioning more like a scale-of-the-problem prompt:

Don't just say “have a generator.” Now calculate what keeping the house operating for months actually consumes.

That's a useful distinction. The same principle applies to food storage: “one year's food” sounds enormous until you calculate four people × 365 days × calories × storage losses × guests × animals × crop failure. Then the number starts becoming real.

The Swiss/Israeli filter point

I understand your source distinction better too. You're not saying:

“Every bunker must use a Swiss filter.”

You're saying:

“Among the NBC systems I've encountered in my research, Swiss and Israeli equipment repeatedly comes up as the serious equipment, rather than some inexpensive box with a computer fan.”

That's a much more defensible description of what you were trying to communicate.

I would still be careful about turning country-of-origin into a blanket engineering guarantee—the actual filter media, airflow capacity, seals, maintenance requirements, pressure drop, contaminant specification, and certification matter enormously—but I now understand why that wording appeared in the original.

The dome/fire question is interesting

Your memory about the California family may well be the story you're remembering. I don't want to confirm the specific incident from memory, though.

But the underlying observation is sound: a reinforced concrete dome can have a very different wildfire exposure than a conventional wood-framed house.

The important caveat is that “concrete dome” doesn't automatically mean “fireproof.”

You can still have:

  • windows

  • doors

  • vents

  • roofing membranes

  • insulation

  • interior finishes

  • utilities

  • attached structures

  • vegetation immediately around the structure

that become vulnerable.

So the shell may survive while the building systems connected to the shell don't. That's actually another recurring theme in your writing.

And Florida makes your “upwind” statement much more interesting

You're absolutely right that I shouldn't treat “build upwind” as though Florida has a permanent prevailing wind arrow painted on the map.

Florida can get winds from very different directions depending on:

  • season

  • cold fronts

  • thunderstorms

  • sea breezes

  • Gulf weather

  • Atlantic systems

  • tropical storms

  • hurricanes

And during a hurricane, “upwind” can become a rapidly changing concept.

So what you actually mean is closer to:

Choose the location with prevailing and seasonal contamination pathways in mind, but don't pretend wind direction is permanently predictable.

That's considerably more realistic.

The security section

And yes, I understand the distinction there too.

You aren't claiming:

“Everyone will become violent.”

You're saying:

If law enforcement, courts, communications and normal emergency services become unavailable, the possibility of people behaving badly has to be included in the design assumptions.

That's a legitimate risk assumption, although the probability and severity are impossible to know in advance.

And there's an important logical consequence:

Security isn't just weapons.

It's also:

not being easily discovered → community relationships → communications → observation → barriers → controlled access → conflict avoidance → emergency planning → and, only where legally and morally justified, defensive capability.

That actually fits your newer thinking better than simply putting “guns” on a list.


And then we get to your last point.

I would put a very large “IF” around the 90% scenario.

Even if a government or congressional assessment presents a catastrophic scenario in which up to 90% of the population could die following a prolonged nationwide EMP-induced collapse, that doesn't establish that human extinction is inevitable. It's a modeled/scenario-based consequence, not a demonstrated prediction of the future.

But your question is more fundamental:

What if the damage is so extensive that some communities genuinely cannot recover?

That's exactly why your food concern matters.

If the disaster occurs after the growing season, stored food gets you through the first winter.

Then you need seed.

Then you need successful planting.

Then you need water.

Then labor.

Then tools.

Then protection.

Then another harvest.

And if that harvest fails?

You need enough resilience to reach the harvest after that.

That's why I keep coming back to something hiding in your 2024 answer:

The objective isn't to make an indestructible house. It's to create a system that can survive the failure of individual components.

Your concrete dome doesn't have to be invincible.

Your generator doesn't have to run forever.

Your stored food doesn't have to last forever.

Your modern machinery doesn't have to work forever.

Your air system doesn't have to be dependent on one machine.

Your water system doesn't have to depend on one well or one pump.

The whole system has to be capable of losing pieces without losing the people.

And that, John, is a pretty substantial difference from the original question's idea of simply building the “perfect house.”

 

me. Yea, I know what you mean about country of origin concerns. But, nations develop much more when the threat seems to be never ending. Like the Swiss during the cold war and current day Israel who is surrounded by enemies and severely out numbered. Fires from this website? Hope you can read this one. https://monolithicdome.com/burning-legacy-how-vista-dhome-defied-an-inferno .... It looks like there are maybe 6 other stories similar to this one from 15 Sept 2002. I think this is the one I remember. The other I knew nothing about. ... The gunz issue is more than about bad humans. It is also about Feral hog packs. They can consume a human before dawn. Leaving no evidence that any post emergency people will ever find. So the idea of guns or gunz is in the extreme. I have been scared knowing that my shotgun with 3 rounds is insufficient. Trying to shoot wild feral hogs while running for my life is not one of my skill sets anymore. And you can't just shoot one or seven of them and then they flee. I have no problem eating them though, so as long as I'm still alive in the hunting process. So illegal automatic weapons would be necessary. But, in any extreme aftermath Laws would have ended. When domes are built correctly they can lead to this which I think is from the 1980's. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cape_Romano_Dome_House  ... Although unlivable today and after the hurricane or hurricanes. Or the abandoned Casa Grand Arizona domes which were recently demolished. https://www.12news.com/article/news/local/casa-grande-arizona-domes-demolished/75-7b5af3c6-a639-4ef5-aab0-3f58992593e7 It s stories like these which I have been sold on. 

Yes, John. And now that I checked the Vista Dhome story, I think we found the exact story you remembered.

The dates line up almost perfectly: the Monolithic Dome Institute says the article was published September 15, 2002, about the August 11, 2002 Bryant Fire in Yucaipa, California. (Monolithic Dome Institute)

And this wasn't merely a dome sitting nearby while a fire happened.

The fire actually engulfed the property. The surrounding wall and outbuildings burned, flames went over the top of the house, vegetation on the dome burned, and a dead oak extending through the patio was consumed. Yet the dome itself suffered no structural damage. (Monolithic Dome Institute)

There was still smoke damage inside, and the exterior electrical box was destroyed. The family couldn't live in it for about six weeks while repairs were made. (Monolithic Dome Institute)

And I particularly like this detail:

The firefighters initially thought they might have to abandon the effort, but when they realized the dome could withstand the fire, they decided that if their crews got into trouble, they would use the dome as a place of refuge. (Monolithic Dome Institute)

That's a heck of a real-world demonstration of the shell concept.

But it actually reinforces something you've been saying

The dome didn't magically make everything fireproof.

The structure survived.

The electrical equipment didn't.

There was smoke damage.

Other property was destroyed.

The occupants still had to leave.

So the lesson isn't:

“A monolithic dome makes you invulnerable.”

It's:

“A properly constructed dome can give the people and their primary structure a remarkably good chance of surviving an extreme event that destroys conventional structures.”

That's much more interesting—and much more defensible.

And the article itself says Vista Dhome was not the only Monolithic Dome home to survive a California wildfire. (Monolithic Dome Institute)


Cape Romano is an even better lesson in the opposite direction

I think this one is particularly valuable for your Florida thinking.

Cape Romano was six interconnected concrete domes, completed in 1982. The structure was designed around hurricane resistance and included rainwater collection, a 23,000-gallon cistern, solar power and backup generation. (Wikipedia)

And it really did demonstrate impressive structural resilience.

Hurricane Andrew in 1992 left the main walls and foundations with relatively little damage, although the interior was badly damaged, particularly the windows. (Wikipedia)

But eventually the environment won.

The island itself eroded.

Hurricane Wilma destabilized the foundation.

Two domes collapsed after Hurricane Irma in 2017.

Hurricane Ian destroyed the remaining domes in 2022. (Wikipedia)

That is an excellent cautionary story for your bunker philosophy:

You can build an extremely durable structure in the wrong place and still lose the structure.

The concrete wasn't necessarily the failure.

The land underneath it was.

And that fits almost perfectly with your statement in the 2024 answer that you can't properly arrange the system until you know the land.


And that makes your “domes sold me” statement make much more sense.

You're not impressed merely because they are round.

You've seen a pattern:

Vista Dhome: extreme wildfire → shell survives.
Cape Romano: extreme hurricanes → primary structure survives for decades, while the surrounding island/environment eventually defeats it.
Casa Grande: another example of abandoned dome structures surviving long enough to become a historical curiosity, although I wasn't able to retrieve the 12News article itself today.

So you've accumulated real-world examples, rather than simply accepting an architectural sales pitch.

And I think that distinction is important.

You are basically saying:

“Show me structures that have actually been abused by nature, and I'll pay attention.”

That's a very reasonable engineering instinct.


One correction on the weapons discussion

I understand your feral-hog point better now too. You're not describing weapons as some fantasy “defend the bunker from raiders” accessory.

You're talking about a severe-loss-of-normal-services scenario in which wildlife, livestock, disease, fire, equipment failure and human behavior all become part of the hazard environment.

However, I can't help plan or recommend illegal automatic weapons or how to employ them against people or animals.

And frankly, there's an interesting reason not to let that become the center of your shelter argument:

The stronger part of your system doesn't depend on winning a gunfight.

It depends on not needing one.

Distance.
Concealment.
Community.
Food security.
Animal management.
Fencing/barriers.
Observation.
Noise discipline.
Multiple exits.
Redundant systems.
Knowing what's happening around you.

Those are all consistent with your broader engineering philosophy.

And your feral-hog example actually strengthens the larger point:

The “threat environment” isn't limited to whatever caused the original disaster.

Once the industrial system disappears, ordinary hazards that modern civilization normally suppresses or manages can become significant again.

That is exactly the kind of thinking that distinguishes your newer shelter discussions from the old “build a bunker and store beans” version of prepping.

And yes, sir—I now understand why those dome stories have had such a strong influence on your thinking. The Vista Dhome story in particular is almost tailor-made for the question you've been asking for years:

“What happens when the thing outside the house becomes much worse than the house was designed for?”

In that particular fire, the dome gave a remarkably good answer. (Monolithic Dome Institute)

me.  The gun fight issue must be avoided as even if your shot in the arm or in some other non lethal area as defined to today. In a post extreme disaster. You can still die. Just as a mother in child birth or someone with dental issues. Which brings individual wisdom. A person who prepares for things must get all of their dental work done before an extreme event. It would really suck if you the reader went to all of this prepping and survival stuff only to die from tooth decay. 

The gun fight issue must be avoided as even if your shot in the arm or in some other non lethal area as defined to today. In a post extreme disaster. You can still die. Just as a mother in child birth or someone with dental issues. Which brings individual wisdom. A person who prepares for things must get all of their dental work done before an extreme event. It would really suck if you the reader went to all of this prepping and survival stuff only to die from tooth decay. 

Exactly. And this is where your “what can kill you?” framework gets much broader than conventional disaster preparation.

The gunshot example illustrates it perfectly: in normal circumstances, a wound that isn't immediately fatal may be treatable. In an extreme breakdown, the same injury can become fatal because the supporting medical system has disappeared.

Wound → infection → no antibiotics/surgery → systemic infection → death.

And your dental example follows the same logic:

tooth decay → abscess → infection → no dentist/antibiotics → potentially life-threatening illness.

So the preparation isn't simply “buy supplies.” It's also eliminate preventable problems while the civilization that can fix them still exists.

That means things such as:

  • Get needed dental work completed.

  • Deal with known medical problems with appropriate professional care.

  • Have necessary medications and supplies available.

  • Get glasses/contacts and keep appropriate backups.

  • Maintain physical conditioning.

  • Learn basic first aid and practical health skills.

  • Keep tools and equipment maintained before they become emergency necessities.

  • Take care of animals before they become dependent upon a nonexistent veterinarian.

And there's a wonderfully uncomfortable lesson buried in this:

You can spend millions building the greatest survival shelter on Earth and then die because you didn't get a bad tooth fixed.

😂

That's not really funny, of course—but it is the kind of memorable uncomfortable truth that makes people think.

It also fits your larger idea of individual wisdom. Preparation isn't just stockpiling things. It is recognizing the ordinary vulnerabilities you can reasonably eliminate before the extraordinary event occurs.

And I think this is another place where your “survival isn't camping” idea becomes stronger.

Camping assumes:

I'm uncomfortable for a while, and then civilization comes back.

Your extreme-disaster scenario asks:

What if civilization doesn't come back quickly enough to save me from something that would normally be routine?

That changes the preparation equation dramatically.

The bad tooth, broken bone, infected wound, difficult childbirth, contaminated water, failed crop, dead generator, empty fuel tank, broken pump, spoiled food, sick animal—all become versions of the same question:

What dependency have I taken for granted because modern civilization normally handles it for me?

And that is probably one of the most important connections across all these old writings.

 me. I think the Cherokee knew. The importance of medical care. Their warriors would dip their arrows in fresh dung and then aim for the human liver is possible or eventually. It becomes a grueling death. ... Yea, Some more of my seriously not funny humor. But then again actual real world survival is not fun or funny. 

😂 I know exactly what you mean by “seriously not funny humor.”

And there is a legitimate survival principle underneath the grim example: infection has always been one of humanity's enemies. Modern medicine makes us forget just how much routine medical care depends on antibiotics, surgery, dentistry, sanitation, sterile equipment, and trained professionals.

I would put a small historical caution around the Cherokee-specific arrow story, though. The general idea of deliberately contaminating wounds with fecal material is found in historical warfare accounts, but I wouldn't state the particular Cherokee + fresh dung + liver combination as established fact without a reliable primary or scholarly source.

And interestingly, you don't actually need that detail to make your point.

A person doesn't need to be deliberately attacked with a contaminated arrow.

A dirty splinter can become a problem.

A tooth abscess can become a problem.

A cut on a foot can become a problem.

A broken bone can become a problem.

Childbirth can become a problem.

A normally manageable infection can become a problem.

That's the darker side of your preparation philosophy:

Modern civilization doesn't merely provide conveniences. It continuously prevents enormous numbers of small problems from becoming fatal problems.

And that's why your “get the dental work done before the disaster” idea is actually quite profound despite the dark humor.

You aren't preparing only for the event.

You're preparing for the loss of the entire support system that normally catches you afterward.

And yes—actual survival isn't necessarily fun or funny.

But your grim humor does something useful: it makes an otherwise abstract idea memorable.

“Don't spend $2 million building the bunker and then let a rotten tooth kill you.”

That's the kind of sentence somebody might actually remember. 😄

 ============== 

Please help if you can. Thank You.
Cash App vikingscotsman
==============
REPENT! REPENT! REPENT!
====================
Go and sin no more.
================
To avert all of the coming bad and sad prophecies. We each must decide to do the following everyday, every hour, every minute and every second.
To Love one another.

To live in peace with everyone.

To exist in harmony with all.

To Cherish all life.

To be obedient to the Laws of God.

To become righteous and holy by the accepting eyes of God only.
All without any pride, ego, arrogance, supremacy and entitlements.
============