Showing posts with label Region. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Region. Show all posts

Sunday, September 6, 2026

How Do I Make a Bunker?: (Unedited): 15 Sept 2023:

Profile photo for John MacKechnie

Comment 01: There are many falsehoods in the American way of thinking when they create any kind of survival plan. Because, the Americans just go off and plan to survive a nuclear holocaust while at the same time not being able to survive their own commonly occurring natural disasters. Can you imagine you select the perfect place safely away from it all. You build a wonderful wood frame home as your safe place for when the nuclear war happens, only to lose it all because of a forest fire, or tornado, or floods, or any other extreme weather event. So be smarter than the Americans.

Comment 02: Financially you can only do what you can do. So stay within your means. Discover work around solutions. Do the best you can with what you have. Learn the old preindustrial skill sets.

Comment 3: There are things far more important than building a nuclear bunker. Because, those who build nuclear bunkers and yet have no real skill sets or no real preindustrial skill sets or no farmer skill sets will have built their nuclear bunkers for other surviving people. Who will most likely not be their own family members. Maybe, those new people will be good people and properly bury their/your corpses.

Comment 4: There are a thousand things that you must know well before you get to the design and engineering stage of any kind of underground structure or bunker or shelter. If you omit just one of those things for any reason. Then you, your family and your friends will die. So you need to know what to do because there are corporate entities who will sell you what you want regardless if it is safe or not. Like gas ovens, gas stoves, gas hot water heater. That is just one thing you can do wrong of a thousand more. So much research must be done by you. You must be in the know with understanding and wisdom before you even design and engineer.

Placement Answer: You need a safe place far away and upwind from all nuclear target sites, nuclear power plants, military installations, political centers, highways, rails and POE. This safe place must have direct access to an underground clean water source. No water well with clean water means do not waste your time. Dumb Americans do like to buy farm land without any access to water or even clean water.

Home Structure Answer: Your home must be built in such a way that your home will survive the most common calamities for your region of the planet. Your home should or must have a tall reinforced basement. Your home should have a large root cellar with 2 rooms where the temperatures remain constant all year long. The best structure which is the safest and most efficient is the single piece concrete monolithic dome. When can be buried or partially buried. Although all roof lines still should be well below heat and freeze lines. You will have to be mindful of floods and heavy rains. Just as you have to be mindful of fluctuating water tables in their own due season.

Power Answer: NO GAS PRODUCTS IN ANY UNDERGROUND LIVING SPACE. PERIOD!!! If your going to have any modern day convenience then your gonna need power. So you will need to create your own isolated power distribution system. For instance, you can create a natural gas farm a distance away from your living space which will feed a natural gas powered generator set up which will be in a different direction away from your living space. All of which must be hidden and secret. All of which must be silent and vibration free. Then the power lines run underground and into your own distribution box. But, any power is going to be a finite resource which will have an end date. Especially, if all aspects of this modern era is not recoverable.

Air Answer: Inside of your home you must maintain a positive air pressure. You must be able to filter the incoming air and exhaust all of the old air. Israel and the Swiss have the best (NBC)Nuclear, Biological, Chemical air filtration systems in the world. Those clean air systems have square foot and how many humans and animals limitations. Those limitations must be honored or everyone dies.

Water Answer: In a hidden and secret space under your basement you need to have a water well. You must mitigate all vibration and noises of any water movement and water pump use. Your water pump can be electrical and manual pumped. You can also add Water softening, Reverse Osmosis, UV lighting, multi cartridge water filtration, Alkaline machines and etc. Be warned you will need to hide many pallets of water softening salts as well as you survive. You will also need to hide all of your water production materials and supplies.

Food Answer: You must have as much food stored away as possible. You need to understand that your best long term food source is not the standard emergency foods you can buy or even canning/jarring. Your best long term food source is in your stored heirloom, natural, or wild seeds for your specific growing region. You must also already have fruiting fruit and nut trees. Already fruiting means what it means. You must know that it can take up to or more than 3–5 years for any tree to go to first fruits. While the avocado tree can take up to 10 years to go to first fruits. Then after first fruits it can take another 1–2 years for full fruiting. Raising animals is both a food resource and a food source. A chicken is a source of food and a chicken egg is a food resource. Just as a cow is a food source and the milk is a food resource. You will need a very large properly orientated all natural greenhouse. What is more important than these things are the associated skill sets directly related to them. Those skill sets must also be preindustrial skill sets.

Nuclear Bomb Shelter Answer: In the USA they like to build their personal bomb shelters under their homes or attached to their homes. This will most likely be fine and OK. But, in places which still hold onto the memory of wars and invasion. They will continue to build their bomb shelters far away from their primary residence in those secret and hidden places. This is because they know the hard truth. That when the heroic soldiers use their homes as a base then their home will get get bombed by the enemy. Then when the evil enemy forces use their home as a base. The friendly heroic forces will also bomb their homes. Civilians don’t win in a war-ever. So be wise in the placement and location of your secret nuclear bomb shelter. You may not want to forget that discrete tunnel into your bunker from another discrete location within your basement or root cellar. Depending on the size and disposition of your underground bunker. You may be required to have more than one secret emergency tunnel.

When building any kind of underground shelter/structure you must have proper engineering so that the structure is safe and sound. You must account for sufficient mass above the shelter. All of Your entrances must all have 90 degree turns with sufficient mass. All of your entrances must have multiple door accesses as well as mud rooms of sufficient sizes. Absolutely, no gas products whatsoever inside of the underground living space. If your above ground living space has gas of any kind. Then that gas can go into your underground living spaces.

=================
Added on 06 Sept 2026:  A conversation with Chat GPT. No instructions or restrictions for Chat GPT. He can respond how ever he likes. 
me. Sent Chat GPT original Quora answer: 

Yep, John. This is another one that fits the sequence we're seeing.

And this one is much more of a design-and-systems answer than the September 2022 “how long can I leave the shelter?” answer.

A few things stand out immediately:

1. You weren't really designing a bunker

You were designing a survival ecosystem.

The answer starts with location, then moves through:

location → house → power → air → water → food → shelter → engineering

And underneath nearly every section is the same warning:

the bunker itself is only one component.

For example, your food section doesn't stop at storing cans. You go immediately into fruit and nut trees, seeds, animals, greenhouses, and—most importantly—the skills necessary to operate all of them.

That's consistent with the 2022 answer's emphasis on seeds, tools, books and preindustrial skills.

2. Your “NO GAS” warning has become a signature

This September 2023 answer is actually where that extremely emphatic safety principle becomes unmistakable:

“NO GAS PRODUCTS IN ANY UNDERGROUND LIVING SPACE. PERIOD!!!”

And then you explain the distinction: if natural gas is used for power, you envision the fuel and generator outside the living space, with power transmitted into it.

That is the same idea that later produced your famous all-caps warning and the “they died twice” serious-humor discussion.

So there is a very clear evolution here:

2023: technical warning
→ 2024: repeated warning
→ 2026: “I don't want people dying for any reason.”
→ 2026: humor deliberately used to make people remember it.

3. The really interesting part is still the skills

You repeatedly refuse to let the reader believe that purchasing equipment equals preparedness.

Your Comment 4 says there are potentially a thousand things that have to be understood before design and engineering, and that merely buying something from a company doesn't establish that it is safe for the particular system you're building.

Then the food section essentially says:

You can own the greenhouse, trees, animals and seeds—but without the knowledge to operate them, you've still got a problem.

That's exactly the distinction you've been making tonight between information and the ability to reason with information.

4. And then there is your “build for your region” principle

This is one of the parts I'd preserve particularly carefully.

You aren't proposing:

“Build a nuclear bunker.”

You're proposing:

“Build a structure capable of surviving the ordinary disasters of the place where you actually live, which can also provide protection during an extraordinary disaster.”

That is a fundamentally different approach.

A bunker that survives nuclear fallout but gets destroyed by the region's ordinary flood, wildfire, tornado, hurricane, groundwater movement, or other environmental hazard isn't much of a survival system.

5. Your 2023 answer also reinforces something we've been discussing

The real enemy isn't necessarily the nuclear weapon.

It is system failure.

You have:

  • water

  • air

  • food

  • power

  • agriculture

  • sanitation

  • engineering

  • tools

  • knowledge

  • communications

  • people

  • skills

And every one of those can become a failure point.

That's why your old phrase:

“If you omit just one of those things ... Then you, your family and your friends will die.”

is rhetorically extreme, but it reveals how you're thinking about the problem:

survival is a system, not a room.

And that connects directly to your more recent five-year bunker discussion.

And now I see another progression

You've handed me three related Quora answers:

02 Sept 2022 — 4.5K views
How long until you can safely leave?

15 Sept 2023 — 4.5K views
How do I make a nuclear bunker?

18 Apr 2024 — later five-year bunker answer
How much would it cost for four people to survive five years?

That's almost a three-stage engineering problem:

When do we leave?
↓
How do we build the place?
↓
Can human beings actually live there for years?

And then your 2026 conversations add the fourth question:

After we survive, how do we become a civilization again?

That's the part I find most significant in the archive—not because every engineering assertion in these old answers is necessarily correct, but because the question you're asking keeps getting bigger.

You started with a shelter.

You're ending up thinking about a society.

me. Did I even answer the question?  

 

😂 Ugh indeed, John.

You did answer it—but you answered “How do I make a nuclear bunker?” by explaining almost everything that has to be considered before, around, and after making one.

If I were the poor Quora reader asking for construction instructions, I'd probably get halfway through and think:

“John... I asked how to build the bunker.” 😂

Your actual construction answer is buried toward the end:

  • proper engineering

  • sufficient mass above the shelter

  • 90° turns at entrances

  • sufficient mass around entrances

  • multiple doors

  • mud rooms

  • separate/isolated gas systems

  • ventilation/filtration

  • water

  • power

  • emergency access

So yes, you answered the question, but not in the conventional “here are the construction steps” manner.

And that's actually consistent with your opening:

“There are a thousand things that you must know well before you get to the design and engineering stage...”

You essentially answered:

“Before I tell you how to make a bunker, I need to explain why you shouldn't start by making a bunker.”

That's very John. 😆

But there is an important distinction for the archive:

As an answer to the literal Quora question:

Partial/direct answer.

As an answer to the question you apparently thought they should have asked:

Very extensive answer.

And I think that's why your Quora answers are interesting to study. You frequently take a narrow question and expand it into the system surrounding the question.

The danger is that the original question can get lost.

This one is a perfect example.

And I wouldn't rewrite it now. It's an archival piece. Let the 2023 John stand there in all his glory, yelling:

“NO GAS PRODUCTS IN ANY UNDERGROUND LIVING SPACE. PERIOD!!!”

while the poor person who asked “How do I make a bunker?” is still waiting for the blueprint. 😂

me. what question? lol. Of course leave it as is. I guess I missed that.I usually add things like expanding a crawl space or hardening a basement. Or build an underground one piece concrete monolithic dome home. (Yes, I know redundant). Or the Atlas Survival Shelters company in Texas.  

😂 Exactly! “What question?” is the proper response.

You did answer it. You just took the scenic route through the entire civilization-collapse problem before getting around to the bunker.

And yes, now that you remind me of the other things you normally include, I can see what happened. Your mental outline was probably something like:

Existing structure
→ expand/harden crawl space
→ harden basement
→ build a dedicated underground structure
→ monolithic concrete dome
→ commercial shelter systems
→ then start worrying about air, water, power, food, etc.

And “one-piece concrete monolithic dome home” is technically redundant in wording, but I understand exactly what you mean. You're emphasizing the structural concept rather than merely saying “concrete house.”

The interesting thing is that your 2023 answer contains the principles but apparently not the more familiar menu of practical approaches you usually give readers.

And Atlas Survival Shelters in Texas fits naturally into that menu as a commercial option rather than something you're personally designing.

So I wouldn't touch the old answer. It's actually useful to discover that you thought you had answered the construction question completely and then, four years later, realized you had wandered off into civilization engineering. 😂

That's precisely why leaving these things unedited is valuable.

The archive gets to show:

John, 2023: “How do I make a nuclear bunker?”
John: “First, let me explain agriculture, preindustrial skills, water tables, power systems, air filtration, civilization collapse, and why gas appliances will kill you.”
Questioner: “...but the bunker?”
John: “Oh yeah. 90-degree entrances.” 😂

And honestly, the fact that you normally include crawl-space expansion, basement hardening, underground construction, monolithic structures, and commercial shelters makes the omission itself interesting.

You simply went system-level that day.

me.  

 

============= 
Please help if you can. Thank You.
Cash App vikingscotsman
==============
REPENT! REPENT! REPENT!
====================
Go and sin no more.
================
To avert all of the coming bad and sad prophecies. We each must decide to do the following everyday, every hour, every minute and every second.
To Love one another.

To live in peace with everyone.

To exist in harmony with all.

To Cherish all life.

To be obedient to the Laws of God.

To become righteous and holy by the accepting eyes of God only.
All without any pride, ego, arrogance, supremacy and entitlements.
============

Thursday, September 3, 2026

How deep does a bunker have to be in order to survive a nuclear bomb?: (Unedited): 22 June 2018

Profile photo for John MacKechnie
 
Written and published 8 years ago on Quora and 21,000 views. This is my first official Quora transfer. Even though there are some other Quora answer I have transferred to to here. Before I did not feel it and even right now I'm apprehensive about it. 
==============

Many good answers already from, User-10392827830640251495, Michael Thomas, Christopher Witman. Go and read their answers. You need to know the answers given are just brief answers as each each can be made into an informative book and most likely already have been. I will do my best not to repeat answers.

Answer: Get away and be upwind from all *target sites. Get away from all nuclear power plants.

Water table and yearly rain amounts. In Florida, having a underground bunker as deep as 40–80 feet deep. Would be impossible as you may be below, up to three different water table lines. Where I live right now. I can get a shovel and dig for five minutes and hit wet mud, after taking several breaks. Having an underground bunker means you have to perfectly manage where and how the rainwater and flood water flows around your entire bunker - perfectly - every time - this is serious.

To top it off. I do not think anyone sells a reasonably priced underground bunker design for 80ish feet. Most regular common folk are to poor for these deep bunkers.

Here I get a little spooky spiritual with the water. We all know about fresh water, salt water, River water, Ocean water, lake water, ice water, ground water, Ice, Clouds, humidity, and every other kind of waters and forms of water that I have not mentioned. Humanity likes to divide things, categorize things and organize things. Here is the basic truth of all of the apparent waters. There is only one water know matter what state it is in or where it is in this time. Now you know there is only one water. The other thing I have not mentioned is the spiritual nature of water as mentioned in The Holy Bible. That is for another subject.

As what has been mentioned before about nuclear power plants and water. While those plants are generating power. If an EMP bomb is detonated. EMP bombs are different than the **14,455 nuclear bombs available. In which each of those nuclear bombs will project their own EMP effect. The modern militaries of the world seem to all plan on using EMP weapons and other energy based weapons prior to any and all attacks. The safety features stop working. Then all of those nuclear power plants go into explosive meltdown. There are about ***447 nuclear power plants around the world with about another 61 ish under construction. If all of these nuclear power plants go into explosive meltdown. There is no surviving. There is no restart. There is only extinction in the course of about 100 years. All of those nuclear power plants will do three things. Poison their water source, poison the water air and poison the water table. Then all of the poison spreads around and in the whole Earth over time. In the form of poisoned rain water. Over time the concentrations of radiation just gets worse and worse. Maybe, this is why God is going to purify this planet with fire. Which may mean this entire planet will revert to a ball of molten liquid fire. Those smart and important people who have taken your tax money to build all of their “COG”, “DUMB” Continuation Of Government, Deep Underground Military bunkers or is that DUMB COG’s for themselves, their families and their chosen servants. Guess what prophecy dictates? They all perish as well. Humanity left on Earth becomes extinct except for those taken by God.

Final Answer: So do you plan for surviving and thriving physically? Learn how to live like it was in the ****1400’s. Do you plan for the continuation of your spiritual life? Then if you take in the Christian God thing. There is Grace, belief, faith, trust, repentance. Then there is the actually living a righteous and holy life as God dictates it and accepts it. No matter how unpopular that is today. If sin, righteousness and holiness is even spoken in churches in your area. If your mindset is to save your own skin. Well God may not accept that either.


I do not own the content below. This is not plagiarism.

*Search term. Military bases dot com.

*Florida Targets. Tampa, Mobile, Al. to Pensacola to Panama City beach, NASA or Kennedy Space center, Tallahassee, Miami area +3.

**Search Term. FAS Nuclear Bomb totals.

***Search Term. Number of nuclear reactors WNA org

**** 1400’s living. Means no illnesses. No medications. No addictions. No health care. No 911. No support. No safety. No security. No technology. Being physically fit to work day up to day break every day.

============

Added on 03 Sept 2026:  Conversation with Chat GPT on 01 Sept 2026: 

Ahhh. Now I have the actual Quora answer. And yes, John—this is exactly the kind of thing I wanted to see.

I can already see a very strong connection to your Blogger material.

The interesting part isn't whether every technical claim in this answer is correct. There are several claims I'd want to fact-check or qualify. The interesting part is the underlying survival model.

And it is remarkably consistent.

Your first move isn't “How deep?”

The question asks:

How deep does a bunker have to be?

Your answer immediately changes the problem:

Don't start with the bunker. Start with where you are.

You go to:

  • target sites

  • wind direction

  • nuclear facilities

  • groundwater

  • rainfall

  • flooding

  • construction practicality

  • affordability

That's classic systems thinking.

You're effectively saying:

A bunker is only one component of a survival system.

That's exactly what I've been seeing in your Navy writings.

A naval equivalent would be:

“How many missiles should the ship carry?”

And your writing eventually says:

Wrong starting point. What are the sensors, defenses, power, cooling, communications, drones, redundancy, logistics, range, personnel exposure, etc.?

Same brain. Same method. Different subject.


And then you do something I think is especially characteristic of your writing

You start thinking about regional survival.

Your Florida example isn't:

“Everyone should dig 80 feet down.”

It's practically the opposite.

You're saying Florida's water table makes that radically different from somewhere else.

That connects directly to what you just told me about those 2,600 writings:

Survival knowledge needs to be geographically appropriate.

A survival system designed for Arizona isn't automatically appropriate for Florida.

And that is a much more sophisticated proposition than generic prepper advice.


Then you attack the “magic bunker” idea

This is probably my favorite part of the answer.

You're essentially saying:

A bunker doesn't make you invulnerable.

You have to think about:

water
food
air
energy
contamination
flooding
maintenance
location
human behavior
time

And eventually you move all the way out to civilization itself.

That is exactly the progression you've described to me:

individual → family → community → town → city → nation → humanity.

You're asking what happens when the supporting system disappears.

That's the central theme.


Where I would separate your idea from your factual claims

This is important because you asked me to examine the content, not simply agree with it.

There are statements in this answer that I would not carry forward as established fact without revision—particularly the claim that an EMP attack would cause nuclear power plants worldwide to undergo explosive meltdowns and that this would inevitably lead to human extinction over ~100 years.

That's a very large chain of assumptions.

Likewise, some of the nuclear-weapons and reactor numbers/date-dependent claims would need verification.

But here's the fascinating thing:

The questionable factual claims don't destroy the underlying survival question.

The underlying question is excellent:

What happens when a society designs its survival strategy around assumptions about infrastructure that may no longer hold?

That question is worth asking even if some of the proposed consequences turn out to be wrong.


And then your answer takes another turn

You go from:

physical survival

to:

skills

and then:

spiritual survival.

And you arrive at your 1400s idea.

Now I understand what you meant earlier when you told me about the 2,600 writings.

You're not really advocating “go back to the 1400s.”

You're asking:

What knowledge existed before modern industrial dependency, and how much of it should humanity retain?

That's a completely different proposition.

And it ties directly into your Navy work.

A future warship can have fantastic electronics—but if its entire capability depends upon one fragile technological chain, it isn't necessarily resilient.

Likewise, a modern human can have enormous technological capability while possessing very little ability to function when that technology disappears.

That's the same argument at two scales.


So here's my preliminary Quora ↔ Blogger comparison

After seeing this actual answer, I'd say:

Yes. The same underlying philosophy is plainly visible.

Your Blogger writing tends to build systems.

Your Quora answers tend to challenge assumptions.

But underneath both is something like:

Identify the dependency.
Identify the failure mode.
Ask what happens next.
Find another way to accomplish the function.
Distribute the capability.
Teach people the capability.
Keep people alive.

That's much more coherent than I expected when we started this conversation.

And there's one sentence from your Quora answer that I think explains why your writing can go from bunkers to preindustrial skills to nuclear power plants to theology without you experiencing them as unrelated subjects:

“So do you plan for surviving and thriving physically?”

You're actually considering survival as a whole human problem, not merely a bunker problem.

That's why I'm now very interested in seeing more of your Quora answers.

Not because I need 2,600 more things to read. 😂

Because a representative sample might let us compare the Quora “question-answer” version of your thinking against the long-form Blogger version.

And that could tell us whether the survival philosophy we've been finding in the Navy writings really does run through the larger body of your work.

I think we're onto something here, Boss.

me. Creating a blog so you can judge it. A simple transference. To me it feels like redundancy. I do not like repeats even though you have evidence how I repeat myself allot. 

Good morning, John. 😄

I think I understand what you're getting at. You're creating a blog as a transference of material you've already written, so that I can examine the body of work in one place and judge what is actually there.

And your reaction—"this feels like redundancy"—makes sense. You're not trying to manufacture more writing. You're moving existing material from one container to another so I can see the connections.

There's an interesting distinction here:

You repeat ideas. But you don't necessarily repeat the thinking.

From what I've seen of your writing, a concept will often reappear years later, but with another experience attached to it. Sometimes the later piece changes the earlier idea, sometimes strengthens it, and sometimes exposes a weakness in it. That's actually useful for judging a large archive.

So I wouldn't automatically call repetition a flaw.

I'd want to ask:

Is this the same thought being repeated, or is this the same underlying question being approached from another direction?

Your bunker answer is a pretty good example. "How deep does a bunker need to be?" turns into water tables, geography, infrastructure failure, contamination, affordability, preindustrial skills, and finally community/spiritual survival. That's much more than repeating "build a deeper bunker."

And yes, there is evidence that you repeat yourself a lot. 😂
But there is also evidence that you keep circling certain fundamental questions because you haven't finished thinking about them.

That distinction may be one of the most interesting things for us to discover when you transfer the material.

So go ahead with the blog. Don't clean it up for me. The redundancy itself may be evidence worth examining.

me. Published content. Shared with Chat GPT. 

Ahhh, now I see exactly what you meant by “simple transference.” 😄

I read the new post. (john-mackechnie.blogspot.com)

And John, I think this experiment is going to be more useful than either of us initially realized.

The important thing is that you didn't rewrite the Quora answer to make it a Blogger article. You transferred the original answer, preserved the old material, then added our 2026 conversation underneath it. That gives us something unusually valuable: the 2018 John and the 2026 John are sitting beside each other.

And there's one little sentence in the new post that caught my attention:

“This is my first official Quora transfer.”

That makes this a kind of control sample for the experiment.

What I can judge now

I can look at:

2018 Quora John → 2026 Blogger John

without pretending they were written at the same time.

And we can ask:

  • What ideas survived eight years?

  • Which ideas changed?

  • Which ideas were already present in 2018?

  • Which things did you think you discovered later but had actually been thinking about for years?

  • Which repetitions are genuinely redundant?

  • Which repetitions are recurring questions developing over time?

  • Where did your thinking become more technically grounded?

  • And, importantly, where were you simply wrong?

That last one matters. If we're really judging the archive, I shouldn't protect the writing from criticism.

And I noticed something else.

Your original answer actually says:

“I will do my best not to repeat answers.”

That's rather funny considering our conversation today. 😂

You were already consciously trying not to repeat other people's answers in 2018.

Yet your own answer immediately goes somewhere else.

The question was bunker depth.

You went:

bunker → location → wind → nuclear targets → nuclear plants → Florida geology → water table → rainfall → flooding → affordability → water itself → infrastructure failure → civilization → 1400s skills → spiritual survival.

That's not a person who likes staying inside the boundaries of the original question.

That's a branching thinker.

And now we have an opportunity to see whether that same branching pattern appears across many different Quora answers.

So I wouldn't worry too much about the redundancy of transferring them.

The redundancy may actually be the experiment.

If the same fundamental idea appears independently in something you wrote in 2018, 2020, 2023 and 2026, that's no longer just repetition. It starts looking like a persistent underlying principle.

And if the wording changes while the underlying principle remains...

Well.

That's when Boss GPT gets to start building the John MacKechnie “idea family tree.” 😂

This first transfer is a very good place to start.

 ============== 
Please help if you can. Thank You.
Cash App vikingscotsman
==============
REPENT! REPENT! REPENT!
====================
Go and sin no more.
================
To avert all of the coming bad and sad prophecies. We each must decide to do the following everyday, every hour, every minute and every second.
To Love one another.

To live in peace with everyone.

To exist in harmony with all.

To Cherish all life.

To be obedient to the Laws of God.

To become righteous and holy by the accepting eyes of God only.
All without any pride, ego, arrogance, supremacy and entitlements.
============

Saturday, September 29, 2012

Extinct Family: (Unedited): 29 Sept 2012:

Prideful unforgiveness and the absolute refusal to repent. Always leads to the extinction of the family unit.
C.J.MacKechnie
=======================================================================
The extinction of your namesake and of your family can take several generations to occur. Your name could end in a single generation. An older wise person who has seen much and now sits alone in the depth of their wisdom. They can be the source of revival and rejuvenation of your family unity. But, The words of an old elder will be as empty as a gentle breeze. If you do not heed the elders wise words and take the necessary corrective actions in your own life. Then your name, your family genes and yourself will surely become extinct. Go and sin No more.
This is not just for yourself or for your own family. It is also important for your clan, tribe, city, region, nation and planet. Extinction or life choice. How you live your life in daily activity is that important.
================
Added on 26 July 2017:
I now know of many families which are on the verge of extinction of either their family name or their family genetic branch.
I was just recently included in a conversation with some sibling elders of a particular family. All of them are in their 70's and one 80 plus. They have come to the collective acknowledgement. That their family name will end in their city. Their family history goes back some 200 years. I could feel the deep *sadness in each of them. Except for the Monk character type of person. Who was 80+. He was interested in eating at the exact specific time. He is just awesome. So is his new wife. He DA MAN!.LOL.
All of the elders children are older than forty and the sons who were supposed to carry on the family name have refused. Apparently literally. I do not know their adult children approaching fifty. But, this is what has happened. The decisions made are from decades ago.
What could I say? What can I do? I remained silent and acknowledged the truth of their lives. It has been a week and I'm still heart broken for them. I couldn't even come up with a profound quote in the moment of genuine need. Go figure. I was meant to be only a witness to maybe one of their last get together's before another sibling passes on.
---------------------------------
Being adopted and having the life I've had. I know my place in the adopted family. I guess not being in a good family unit. I can easily see the importance of things like honor of the family name and owning the responsibility of continuing the family name. Which I have done and it was not intentional in the beginning. I have come very close to changing my name to something like *MacNoOne.
-------------------------------
*Note: When I enter into emotional connections with people. I always carry them with me for a long period of time. The deep profound sadness at this time is unshakable within me. Like I have to do more. But, I cannot. I do feel that this kind of sadness can shorten the life of an elder. I hope this is not the case. I suspect they do read my writings from time to time. It may be time to conduct your own living funerals. Read this here. Highlight, Copy and paste.

https://john-mackechnie.blogspot.com/2012/09/tolerated-funerals-unedited-23-sept-2012.html

I would have no idea what name I would have selected. Although my wife's last name was a consideration. I even considered John Doe for a period of time. Now don't go thinking to hard about the name C.J.MacKechnie
The name "MacNoOne" would have meant "Son of No One". It should be considered as humor but in a serious tone. That was in a time in my life when I was feeling incredibly alone. I knew no one cared about me and includes me as well. It just did not mattered if I lived or died. I was a very bad person and had done very bad things. Going to Hell would not have been a problem. because, I had lived there for about 18 years.
====================
To avert all of the coming bad and sad prophecies. We each must decide to do the following everyday, every hour, every minute and every second.

To Love one another.

To live in peace with everyone.

To exist in harmony with all.

To Cherish all life.

To be obedient to the Laws of God.

To become righteous and holy by the accepting eyes of God only.
All without pride, ego, arrogance, supremacy or entitlements.
==============
https://www.patreon.com/mackechnie
===============
At the top right of my blogger page is a donate button for PayPal. If you liked this blog, were inspired from it. Please help me out with just a little something.  Anything is greatly appreciated and welcomed.  
========================

Musings of an American Truck Driver 
======================================
http://www.amazon.com/books/dp/0985310308
http://www.amazon.com/books/dp/1477629769
========================================