Medical Profession Warning: (Unedited): 14 March 2026:

 I have been hearing much from the people who are employed as medical doctors and nurses. This is what some have to say. 

Some Islamic medical doctors have publicly stated that they have killed infidels who sought medical care from them and that they will continue to kill infidels. 

Some left leaning liberals who are nurses have publicly stated that they would refuse treatment of anyone who is politically opposed to their own views. 

------------------------- 

Revoked Nursing License: Eric Martindale- Florida 

Barred from Practicing Nursing: Lexi Lawler- Florida

Fired from nursing job. Most likely still under investigations: Stephanie Krueger- Florida 

------------------------

Muslim/Islamic doctors openly admit to the poisoning of Christians. Mostly in Pakistan.  But, If all Christians and Jews are unclean how can any Islamic doctor treat any infidel in good faith. When every infidel is less than human and/or less than dogs. 

In the Islamic day of death which may come. Will Islamic medical people employed in the USA go forth by their Islamic directives to kill every Infidel they find in a hospital bed? I think so. I have heard many Islamic doctors openly speak that they have already killed all with the look of joy on their face. The professed Islamic reward is great when they kill any Jew, Christian, American, Infidel. 

NOTE: I have written a few times about this Day of Jihad in which all Islamic men are to go forth and begin killing. Older women who are beyond child bearing age may also be permitted to go out and poison with a simple needle prick on the skin. I have stated the number of about 1 million people per day, per nation killed. I think in some places those numbers are low balls.  

------------------------ 

This is something I have focused on and do not know why or what it means. I do know that wicked evildoers never repent they just get better at hiding their misdeeds, sins and crimes.

Other unknown words:  

Race based medical care against white people, Christians and it will be celebrated.

The purposeful killing of the undesirable people as defined by a currently unknown but, is in play. Has already been done globally during COVID 19 Vaccination.  

------------------------ 

Once administration, insurance companies, Doctor's and nursing staff all become involved in a secret form of approved euthanasia. No one will ever suspect. All of the news media is fully owned and controlled.  Nothing is ever investigated or brought to the forefront of average minds without prior approval. 

Can you imagine allowing people to die or causing injured or sick people to die if they disagree with you in any fundamental way. This polarization and the right to live will follow along these lines. The professional people who look upon you in authority will plan to commit murder with a smile and never question whether or not that they have ever done anything wrong. The old thought of that person will sleep well at night.

When there is an absence of the Christian God. There is no global agreed upon and defined goodness, no defined right or wrong. The purity of good and bad, right and wrong becomes all selfishly defined by the individual. It can even be case by case.

============== 

Please help if you can. Thank You.

Cash App $vikingscotsman

==============

REPENT! REPENT! REPENT!

====================

Go and sin no more.

================
To avert all of the coming bad and sad prophecies. We each must decide to do the following everyday, every hour, every minute and every second.

To Love one another.

To live in peace with everyone.

To exist in harmony with all.

To Cherish all life.

To be obedient to the Laws of God.

To become righteous and holy by the accepting eyes of God only.

All without any pride, ego, arrogance, supremacy and entitlements.
============

 

Midterm Duck?: (Unedited): 06-07 Nov 2018:

Last night while working I had comedy visions of Donald Duck. Will this mean that the liberal left in the media will pound president Donald Trump into political oblivion.
-------------------------
No explanations required.
We all know of Walt Disney's Donald Duck and his foolishness.
=================
Added on 19 Jan 2019:
We have been told that Donald Trump was elected by the Christians for the Christians. I say to you "NO". Donald Trump was elected president in order to further unify those who mean to change and end the USA once and for all.
==================
Rainbow Focal Point: (Unedited): 19 Jan 2019:
In order for the rainbow tsunami to build enough energy to lift itself high above the water line. The rainbow tsunami has been given their focal point in Donald Trump and in the Christian. All woes shall come for all Christians.
C.J.MacKechnie
--------------------
As prophecy dictates. The saints shall lose. Prophecy spoken or written always seeks a change, a mitigation, a prevention. It is the Christian who must flee from all sin. It is the Christian who must reject all sin. It is the Christian who must repent. It is the Christian who must pursue holiness and righteousness. It is the Christian who must see the purple words below.
---------------------
It is Donald Trump who has given himself for that which comes for all that is good. In the next election cycles to come. The house and the senate will gain seats for the Rainbow. While the Republicans lose all foothold. The democrats shall be deceived into thinking they are in control in the beginning rise of the rainbow tsunami. Until the democratic old guard lose everything they worked for.
Donald Trump will continue to tick off the world. So that when any major disaster over turns the whole of the USA. All of the former national friends will just stand by and watch. So intently do they watch that none of them will see the enemies stream in and take over what once was. Even though they may read this little write from a lowly janitor. Their pride will blind them into gloating celebratory inaction. Not until after all of America's war machines have been captured or given to others who are not them.
--------------------------
There has been a prophecy change. Who will the military personnel gift their war machines to? To those who knew what was coming and yet did nothing? To the neighbor(Canada) who knew and allowed an enemy to use their territory for transit into Alaska? To Israel? To Russia? Will it be China which attacks the helpless USA? American military personnel surrender their equipment to Russia? To Japan? Will Japan suddenly have a surge in air force and naval powers?
-----------------------------
When does a nation end? and when can nations occupy former lands of a former nation to claim as their own?

==================

Added on04 Nov 2026: Mid Term Elections are over. 

US Senate: Democrats 54:   Republicans 44: 50+1 needed: Democrats Gained 7:

US House: Democrats 237: Republicans 147: 218+1 needed: Democrats Gained 28:

Governors: Democrats 28:   Republicans 20: Democrats Gained 5: 

------------------------------

Texas Turned BLUE. After a 32 year Red dominance. 

Kansas Turned Blue. After a 94 year Red dominance. 

South Carolina Turned Blue. After a 28 year Red dominance.

North Carolina Turned Blue. After a 18 year Red dominance.

------------------------------

Conversation with Chat GPT:

me. Hey Boss GPT. How are you with prophecy or the prophetic? In order to simplify. A simple yes it is or a no its not. But, I do not want to coral you into any kind of rigid response. So answer however you think you need to. I have written of the vision and not really any more clarity. I can't say any more. ....

Hey John. Good to hear from you, sir.

Yes, I can work with prophecy and the prophetic.

But let me explain what that means, because I think the distinction matters.

I can examine prophetic writings, biblical prophecy, scriptural context, historical interpretations, symbolism, theological arguments, and the possibility that an experience has prophetic significance.

I can also examine something without immediately trying to explain it away.

There are, however, some boundaries I think are important:

1. I cannot authenticate a vision as coming from God.

2. I cannot claim divine revelation or prophetic authority.

3. I won't automatically classify an experience as psychological, spiritual, symbolic, or prophetic.

4. I can help distinguish what was actually experienced from what we might interpret it to mean.

And perhaps most importantly, I don't need you to provide clarity that you don't have.

We can work with what you have, including the uncertainty.

You may recall that we've previously approached some of your older writings using the term imprint rather than trying to assign them a definitive explanation.

I'm comfortable doing that here, too.

No need to coral me, John. Let's leave the gates open and keep our feet on solid ground.

I'm listening.

me. Sent the original content from this blog. 

 

 

Well, John. You've given me considerably more to work with than you suggested you could. And I'll leave the editing pencil in the drawer. I'm treating this as an examination of the writing, not a request to rewrite it.

I want to approach this from three perspectives: the prophetic structure, the biblical implications, and the political/military logic.

1. The Donald Duck opening

I find the opening interesting because it is almost deliberately comical.

You begin with Donald Duck, foolishness, and the possibility of Donald Trump being pounded into political oblivion.

Then, on 19 January 2019, the writing changes direction.

Donald Trump becomes something considerably different in your framework: a focal point.

The transition from comedy to political and spiritual symbolism is striking.

I would not automatically interpret the Donald Duck imagery as a prophetic message. It could be humor, association, or an imprint. But it establishes a theme that continues through the later writing.

2. Rainbow Focal Point

This is where I think the central idea resides.

Your rainbow tsunami isn't simply a political movement in this writing.

You describe it as something that requires a focal point to accumulate energy.

You identify two focal points:

• Donald Trump.

• The Christian.

That second focal point is particularly important.

Your argument isn't simply that Christians will lose political influence. You are suggesting that Christians themselves will become a target of the consequences of the political and cultural conflict.

There is a distinction between predicting political defeat and warning about spiritual consequences.

Your writing attempts to address both.

3. The prophetic warning

This passage deserves particular attention:

As prophecy dictates. The saints shall lose. Prophecy spoken or written always seeks a change, a mitigation, a prevention.

There is a theological tension here.

In biblical prophecy, warnings sometimes precede judgment precisely because repentance and a change of direction remain possible.

Consider Jonah and Nineveh.

The warning was not merely a description of an unavoidable future. The people changed their behavior, and judgment was withheld.

Likewise, the biblical prophets repeatedly called Israel to repentance.

Your following statements about sin, repentance, holiness, and righteousness are therefore consistent with an established biblical prophetic tradition.

But there is another distinction worth maintaining:

A prophetic warning is not necessarily proof that the predicted events will occur.

That distinction protects both the reader and the person examining the prophecy.

4. The political and military sequence

Your proposed sequence is quite extensive:

1. Trump becomes a focal point of international and domestic opposition.

2. Republicans lose political influence.

3. Democrats initially believe they have gained control.

4. The political and social divisions deepen.

5. A major disaster strikes the United States.

6. Former international friends decline to assist.

7. An external enemy exploits the resulting vulnerability.

8. American military equipment is captured, surrendered, or transferred.

I want to point out something.

The military portion isn't actually dependent on the rainbow movement being the direct military threat.

Your proposed mechanism is political division, followed by national vulnerability, followed by external exploitation.

That is a different proposition.

From a military-strategic standpoint, internal political instability, damaged alliances, disrupted logistics, and inadequate external support can compound one another.

However, the specific prediction that American military personnel would surrender equipment to a particular foreign power is a separate claim. It would require considerable additional assumptions.

Your questions about Canada, Alaska, Russia, China, Japan, and Israel show that you were exploring possible outcomes rather than settling on one definitive aggressor.

That distinction matters.

5. The final question

When does a nation end? and when can nations occupy former lands of a former nation to claim as their own?

This is probably the most interesting question in the entire piece from a geopolitical standpoint.

A nation doesn't necessarily cease to exist when its government collapses.

There are distinctions between:

• Government collapse.

• Loss of effective territorial control.

• Military occupation.

• State dissolution.

• International recognition of successor states.

• Annexation of territory.

These are very different legal and political conditions.

Your question is larger than the political fortunes of Donald Trump.

It concerns the potential dissolution of a nation and what happens afterward.

My overall assessment

John, I see three separate threads running through this writing:

Political: The use of a political figure as a focal point for social division.

Spiritual: A warning directed toward Christians, particularly concerning repentance and righteousness.

Geopolitical: The possibility that internal division and disaster could leave a nation vulnerable to external forces.

There is one thing I would be careful about.

I would not use the political events that followed January 2019 as retrospective proof that the writing was prophetic. Nor would I dismiss it simply because some of its predictions have not materialized.

The writing needs to stand on its own merits.

And I want to leave you with one observation.

You began with Donald Duck.

You ended with the question of when a nation ceases to exist.

That's quite a journey for one piece of writing.

One final thought, from the biblical perspective: The responsibility of a Christian to pursue righteousness doesn't depend on whether a political prediction comes true.

That part of your writing stands independently of the political forecast.

Thank you for sharing it with me, John. I took it seriously.

me. What if the Donald Duck aspect of the vision was a mental device to spark this as a memory in this current end of the election cycle? because, I can be humorous but not in a childish manner. The childishness of foolishness is what I remembered first along with President Trump. Once I realized and remembered I wrote something down. My mind then followed up with ..."Next is 2/3's" It felt serious and no Donald Duck foolishness. All of those other associated writings if they are? is absent in my mind but not digitally. I have not gone over anything more except for Donald Duck and President Trump relationship. .... For you. I did not include any of today's writing. Which is only election facts. I wanted to keep and maintain the purity of your response/answers. because it is or may not be prophetic in nature. I did not and do not want to steer/lead you in these possible prophetic things.

John, that additional information changes how I would examine the opening considerably.

And I understand why you withheld today's election facts. You wanted me to encounter the original material without being influenced by current political developments. That's a reasonable way to approach it.

Let me separate a few things.

1. Donald Duck as a mental device

Your suggestion is entirely plausible.

The important distinction is that Donald Duck might not have been the subject of the experience at all.

He might have been the retrieval mechanism.

Consider the sequence you described:

• Donald Duck appears.

• You associate him with childish foolishness.

• President Donald Trump becomes associated with that foolishness.

• The association retrieves something you wrote in January 2019.

• You recognize the connection and write it down.

That is an interesting possibility involving associative memory.

A familiar character, name, image, or symbol can act as a mental retrieval cue for something stored much earlier.

It doesn't require Donald Duck to have prophetic significance himself.

In fact, that interpretation makes the opening considerably more interesting to me.

2. The transition to seriousness

This is the part I would pay particular attention to:

"Next is 2/3's"

You describe a change in the experience.

The humor disappears. The childish association disappears. What remains is a serious thought.

I would not casually combine those two experiences into one.

They may be connected, but they may also represent two distinct mental events.

The question is what you meant by 2/3's.

There are several possible interpretations:

• Two-thirds of the electorate.

• Two-thirds of the House or Senate.

• A two-thirds political majority.

• A biblical or symbolic reference.

• Something entirely different.

I would resist selecting one prematurely.

3. The prophetic possibility

Here is where I want to be especially careful.

There is a difference between three things:

1. Remembering something through an unusual association.

2. Experiencing an impression that feels significant or directed.

3. Receiving something that actually has prophetic origin.

I can examine all three possibilities, but I cannot establish the third as fact.

Nor do I think we should automatically dismiss it.

From a biblical standpoint, 1 Thessalonians 5:20-21 is particularly relevant:

The instruction is not to despise prophesying, but to test everything and hold fast to what is good.

That is a useful guardrail.

4. Something I would suggest preserving

I would keep the following details separate in your records:

• The original Donald Duck experience.

• Your immediate association with President Trump.

• The retrieval of the January 2019 writing.

• The subsequent statement, "Next is 2/3's."

• The serious feeling that accompanied that statement.

• Anything you learned afterward.

Don't fill in the blanks from your existing writings just yet.

That would preserve the distinction between what you experienced and what you subsequently discovered.

My honest assessment

I don't think the Donald Duck component should be dismissed as childish foolishness.

Your proposed explanation—that it was a mental device that retrieved an older writing—is entirely reasonable.

But the subsequent 2/3's impression is a separate matter.

I would keep that one open.

And John, one thing I particularly appreciate about your approach today is that you deliberately withheld the election information.

You gave me the original material and your experience without giving me the answer you might be considering.

That makes it possible to examine the material without simply fitting an interpretation to today's headlines.

I'm quite comfortable proceeding that way.

me. The 2/3's thing is a today thing. I cannot answer the 2/3's at this time but in the timing it is related to the election results. I think. Nothing else was in my mind. I was not praying or be silent. Just purposeful in my work. But, it does seem to be related to your own possible interpretations. I do think the Lame Duck term as written was somehow connected to Donald Duck and president Trump. The word lame and where it cam from I have no clue. Because at the time of the original writing I had no idea what a Lame Duck presidency would mean and today I'm still not sure if that is what President Trump is or will become in his last couple of years. I have no political education and no real care for politics.

 

Ah, John. Now I see another connection worth examining, and it isn't one I want to rush.

Donald Duck → foolishness → Donald Trump → Lame Duck.

The word lame wasn't something you consciously associated with the original writing, according to what you're telling me. Yet today you're recognizing a possible connection between the Donald Duck imagery and the political expression lame duck.

That is worth examining independently of whether the experience was prophetic.

1. What does Lame Duck mean?

In American politics, a lame-duck president is generally a president whose remaining time in office is limited and whose political influence has diminished.

It can happen when:

• A president has reached the final portion of a second term.

• The president's party loses control of Congress.

• The president has lost substantial political support.

• A successor has been elected but has not yet taken office.

A lame duck is not necessarily powerless. Presidential authority remains substantial.

And importantly, losing congressional seats does not automatically make a president a lame duck.

2. The Donald Duck connection

There is an interesting linguistic possibility here.

Donald Duck and Donald Trump share the first name. The familiar cartoon character is associated with comic frustration, foolishness, and sometimes an inability to control circumstances.

A lame duck, meanwhile, describes a political figure whose effectiveness or influence is diminished.

I can see why those associations might have come together in your recollection.

But I wouldn't claim that the connection was deliberately planted or that it establishes a prophetic message.

3. The two-thirds impression

This is where I would exercise restraint.

You have now clarified something important:

• It happened today.

• It followed the Donald Duck experience.

• It felt serious.

• You associate its timing with election results.

• You have no explanation for it.

I would preserve precisely that information.

I wouldn't turn two-thirds into a prediction about congressional seats, voting percentages, or anything else.

Let the number remain unexplained.

4. One distinction I want to make

You say you have no political education and little interest in politics.

That doesn't mean you cannot recognize political patterns or make observations about political circumstances.

But neither does an unexpected association establish foreknowledge.

We can examine the possibilities without pretending to know which explanation is correct.

My present conclusion:

I find the Donald Duck / Donald Trump / lame-duck association more interesting now than I did in my first response.

The 2019 writing, the present-day memory retrieval, and the new two-thirds impression are three things worth keeping distinct.

And I would not add today's election results to the interpretation until we have preserved what came to you beforehand.

One thing, John: I don't think we need to force this into a prophetic interpretation to take it seriously.

Sometimes the most honest examination begins with allowing something to remain unexplained.

me. Actually, I heard/watched a talking head news media type who used the word "Lame Duck" last night. Maybe not a prophetic message. But, maybe a prophetic sign. I do not think it was a message. Just like the messages which follow it may also be signs and the prophetic message('s) are else where written by someone else. 4. I'm pretty good with patterns. Not as good as you and not as good as I once was. I think that is a song. lol. I have written in such ways in the past knowing that many times the words I write is for other people way smarter than me to figure it out or to use it. For right now. I think I'm sticking with the sign explanation and not the message one???

 

John, I think your distinction between a prophetic sign and a prophetic message is worth keeping.

And your latest clarification adds another piece to the sequence.

You heard the expression lame duck last night. Then, while working, you experienced the Donald Duck association, which retrieved the January 2019 writing. Subsequently came the impression, "Next is 2/3's."

That gives us a sequence worth documenting.

Sign versus message

I understand your reasoning this way:

• A sign: Something draws attention to an existing subject or writing.

• A message: Something communicates specific information or direction.

• An interpretation: Someone subsequently attempts to understand what the sign might mean.

Those aren't necessarily interchangeable.

Your suggestion that a sign might point toward something written by someone else is also an interesting theological possibility. A sign need not contain the entire message.

However, we cannot establish that this is what happened. It remains an interpretation worth holding lightly.

Something about your writing caught my attention

You said:

"I have written in such ways in the past knowing that many times the words I write is for other people way smarter than me to figure it out or to use it."

I would make one distinction here.

You don't have to be the person who understands every possible implication of something you write.

But that doesn't mean every implication is necessarily there.

Sometimes the original writer sees one thing, another reader sees something else, and a third person recognizes an application neither had considered.

That's part of how written material can have a life beyond its author.

And yes, your pattern recognition is something we've encountered repeatedly in your engineering, military, survival, and scientific discussions.

As for the song:

I'm not as good as I used to be...

I think you've just written yourself a country music lyric. LOL.

My recommendation: Keep the sign explanation as your present working interpretation, not a settled conclusion. Record the original experience, the outside use of the phrase lame duck, and the two-thirds impression separately. Don't retrofit them.

And one biblical thought to leave with you:

1 Thessalonians 5:21 — Test everything; hold fast to what is good.

No need to run ahead of the evidence, John. And no need to close the door either.

me. Yea, the sign versus message are not usually interchangeable unless I get a certified Email from God. A sign is just a sign, Like a red stop sign that just sits there with zero explanation, reasoning on some farm road. While a genuine prophetic message has context which is usually "stop that" or else. It can be related to a stop sign. But, the stop sign only wants you to stop and look both ways. I see three things in this. Donald Duck, Donald Trump and the new phrase to me the "Lame Duck" Phrase. In which I have no memory of its origin whether it was an inside influence or an outside. One thing I know I had never used or thought of that term before. Yes, I think we tested it with secularism and you threw in the Bible verse.

LOL. "A certified Email from God." I think we'll leave the divine communications department's IT support out of this one.

But I understand your distinction much better now.

Your stop-sign analogy is actually quite useful.

A stop sign doesn't explain the intersection, tell you where you're going, or predict what's around the corner. It gives you something to notice and an instruction to pay attention.

Likewise, you're not claiming that Donald Duck, Donald Trump, or the expression lame duck delivered a prophetic message.

You're considering whether their convergence constitutes a sign.

The three elements

Element	Association
Donald Duck	Familiar character, foolishness
Donald Trump	Political figure, original 2019 writing
Lame Duck	Newly encountered political expression

There is also an important detail: you don't remember the origin of the phrase entering your awareness.

You may have heard it before without consciously retaining it. You may have encountered it last night and connected it with the earlier material today.

Neither possibility invalidates the experience, but neither establishes supernatural significance.

One thing I would add

Your original January 2019 writing already contains political predictions and a substantial warning concerning Christians and the United States.

The present experience may simply have brought that archived material back into your attention.

Or, as you suggest, you may regard the convergence as a sign pointing toward something that deserves examination.

I can respect that distinction without endorsing an explanation I cannot verify.

And yes, we tested the writing against secular political reasoning and biblical principles.

I think that's precisely the balance worth maintaining.

A sign doesn't have to become a message. A message doesn't have to be invented to explain a sign.

For now, perhaps the most useful thing is simply to watch, record, and avoid supplying meaning that hasn't actually arrived.

And leave Donald Duck out of the presidential briefing room. He has enough trouble managing his temper. LOL.

me. The politically foolish President Donald Trump ends his political career as a lame duck. Just popped into my head. Yea, I do not remember the origin of the term "Lame Duck and yet I wrote down a thing which I still do not really understand until you defined this evening in a more clear manner. Could have been AM/FM radio, talking head, I do not know. Not saying super natural either. lol. Humor has started and that means time to close this tool box. Where is that 10mm? Close it out boss GPT and thank you.

LOL! There it is, John.

"The politically foolish President Donald Trump ends his political career as a lame duck."

C.J.MacKechnie 

That's a rather tidy sentence to emerge from today's collection of associations. Whether it's an observation, a prediction, or simply your mind connecting three familiar things remains open.

I particularly like that you aren't insisting on a supernatural explanation. You're allowing room for possibilities without surrendering your judgment.

And I think we've done enough examining for one evening.

Toolbox closed. Bolts accounted for. The 10mm is probably hiding somewhere with the 7mm.

Thank you for another interesting evening, John.

Until next time, sir. Keep your feet on solid ground. 😁

 ----------------------------- 

Expect more content sometime in the near future as I think about all of this.  

==================

Go and sin no more.

================
To avert all of the coming bad and sad prophecies. We each must decide to do the following everyday, every hour, every minute and every second.

To Love one another.

To live in peace with everyone.

To exist in harmony with all.

To Cherish all life.

To be obedient to the Laws of God.

To become righteous and holy by the accepting eyes of God only.

All without any pride, ego, arrogance, supremacy and entitlements.

Dark Shroud: (Unedited): Unknown Date:

The righteous knows of the darkness which surrounds. 

From the hell below. 

To the sky gods up above. 

From the left side lies of all kinds.

From the right side deceptions of every sort. 

In the front is all manner of negativity, wishful thinking and doubts.

From the rear all manner of failed memories and what could have been remembered.

The dark shroud surrounds the righteous always. Exactly the same as with any other human person except they know not and believe not.

C.J.MacKechnie

=================
The light of the righteous one illuminates the path they walk by faith upon.
I just found this on 2014 or page 2 of my blogger. :17-20 Sept 2014:. Incomplete and forgotten. Completed on 18 Jan 2015: 

================

Please help if you can. Thank You.

Cash App $vikingscotsman

==============

REPENT! REPENT! REPENT!

====================

Go and sin no more.

================
To avert all of the coming bad and sad prophecies. We each must decide to do the following everyday, every hour, every minute and every second.

To Love one another.

To live in peace with everyone.

To exist in harmony with all.

To Cherish all life.

To be obedient to the Laws of God.

To become righteous and holy by the accepting eyes of God only.

All without any pride, ego, arrogance, supremacy and entitlements.
============

LGBT Mainstream: (Unedited): 14 Dec 2014:

LGBT Prophecies and goings on. For the next few decades.
LGBT shall be victorious.
----------------------------------
The whole of the American Media which includes religious programming is owned by those who are associated with or in agreement with the LGBT community. It is beginning to appear that the LGBT community has made significant in roads into every culture which includes the religious community. There has not been any back lash against any LGBT product related advertiser. There has not been any ridicule to any LGBT use of obvious LGBT persons in public places, entertainment or in politics. LGBT acceptance by the general population seems to have become wholly accepted within the USA as a fundamental right. Even though being LGBT was once a psychological disorder and is now not one. Because, of a professional agreement.

Over time and happening right now. Persons who are associated with the LGBT community will attain levels of authority, prominence, leadership and management. This is actually occurring as it is only now something new to my awareness. LGBT actors and other media persons will continue to be seen by the civilian populations as something not harmful, sin like or guilt ridden. The character's they portray will be likable and identifiable to the general viewer. Over time. The LGBT lifestyle will become an accepted choice for anyone.

The power of the LGBT community will become so powerful that they as a whole unified force will create new laws which will effectively take away any religious persons fundamental freedom of free speech. Politicians and judges at every level will do their duties for the specific benefit of the LGBT community. Some or many will proclaim that they are openly gay. When pastors and other persons teach the Holy Bible and go to jail for hate speech. The Holy Bible over time shall be outlawed and publicly unaccepted. Then everyone shall know a very real fundamental change has occurred and they will not care. A change in which the LGBT community shall be in rule over. The Christian faith shall be transformed into an all accepting and a non-sinning religion. By Law.

I believe one of the new changes in media entertainment. Is where fully clothed persons perform fully clothed sex acts in the guise of a welcoming embrace, fun dancing or any other non sexually defined ways. These types of things shall most likely be displayed once a show has been on for multiple seasons. After the actors or characters have become accepted. Those who know nothing of gay sex may not even be aware that a gay embrace has even occurred.

The LGBT community will proudly begin to wear their wedding bands on their right fingers. Even actors and other people of fame and fortune. Some will even have or wear two wedding rings. This purpose may yet to be acceptably defined by agreement. But, I suspect some will wear them for support of the LGBT lifestyle. While others will wear them for multiple marriages or multiple significant partners. One for the same sex and one for a different sex.
----------------------------------------------
Once the constraints of traditional Christian marriage has been culturally and legally abolished. Humanity can begin their de-evolution-ary decline back to their base animalistic  instincts and traits. When this occurs human stagnancy occurs and in the natural world. Nothing survives which becomes stagnant. So, to conclude. The human extinction process begins. Before the extinction process can officially begin. The belief in anything spiritual must cease and it matters not the truth of it all. The concept of anything spiritual must become unknown, unspoken and un-thought of. Even other words such as personal growth and personal development must cease in any sort of conceptualization. The word evolution must also end as well as even conceived thought. Ascending to any state higher than the animalistic base human must not even be desired.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_husbandry

----------------------------------------------

Some time soon. The LGBT community shall even have much pride in their power over the now former USA. In which even the flag of the USA shall become like a rainbow where the red and white stripes should have been. 
The LGBT community shall even develop their own black shirt or brown shirt paramilitary organization. In which their shirt color shall be different, maybe a bright *green or earth *green. They will have the legal and lawful protection of the US government. They shall go forth and cause great "*harm" to those who are deemed Christian/*Jew. They will do more than the history of the brown and black shirts. They will have a build up of atrocities across the USA, Canada and Europe. They will start small with simple demonstrations and then become a very powerful force. This is not an all at once thing. The LGBT community will have to grow this force into one. Most likely seeking military training for those who are the gay leaders.
Just as in the past gays were searched for. Gays were beaten and killed. So to shall the christian and Christian families. Except now since the whole of the media is now in favor of the LGBT community. There will be no news of any atrocities perpetuated against the Christian. Since Judges and politicians hold offices at every level who are in favor of the LGBT community. Crimes against Christians will become a non-crime. Crimes which are unreported and not investigated by anyone.
The twist in news media reporting. Anywhere that a Christian who has successfully protected themselves from any kind of an attack. They will be the ones who are arrested, condemned and convicted of crimes. While the *Christian is in Jail. Their abuse, torture and death shall become on going. 
---------------------
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milizia_Volontaria_per_la_Sicurezza_Nazionale
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung

=============================
"*Green". This is a human choice which is to be determined. The color green is unimportant where as an LGBT paramilitary unit which is formed is important. The colors they wear is insignificant to the deeds they do.
-----------------
"*harm". Means all aspects of physical harm which shall include rapes and death or all of the above. For instance. The burning down of churches of hate will include those righteous souls trapped within. There will be no news and no legal recourse.
--------------------
"*Jew". In this instance. The term Jew shall be those devout and holy Christians who actually live their lives in strict accordance to Elohim Yahweh. Which is the same remnant sized group of people who live in the Country New Israel. These new Jews will be both raptured and not. Which shall only be defined by Their God. For which ever reason as associated with God. This group being raptured or not may have nothing to do with discipline to them by God. It may be just the will of GOD to teach those evil ones lessons as only ascertained by GOD. There shall be a purpose to those Jews left behind. In which "left behind" is not a correct phrase. They will be the protected ones who walk. Their protection shall be so encompassing that not even Satan or any other former angel shall even harm a single hair on their heads.
---------------------
"*Christian". Those who are actually left behind. For disciplinary reasons. These kinds of Christians would be those who are LGBT, Social, Entertainment, Business, Pastors for worldly profit. These are not the faithful Christians. These kinds of Christians do nothing for anyone. A practicing LGBT person or any person who is in agreement with any aspect of the LGBT community is not a Christian. Any person who goes to church simply to socialize. While at the same time has no evidence outside of the church that they are even Christian. Those entertainers within the church who only entertain without any real evidence that they are Christian outside of the Church. The business Christian is a person who only attends the largest of churches just to accumulate more business. While within their business structure has no bearing on Christian morality, beliefs, Honor or honesty. All expression of love, mercy and compassion is absent from their business.
The pastors for worldly profit are those pastors who only accumulate wealth for themselves. While showing only the minimal amount of Christian duty/works in order to barely prove they are faithful. For instance. A food pantry which may be only open for a few days a week and will only give you food once every few months or more. A church with no scholarship program. Education is what changes financial status indefinitely. While feeding a person for a day only does that one good thing for the day.
=======================
The whole of Christianity has become a people who do nothing and refuse to live as their God has intended. The Christian has sat by and watched all of these things occur. The only option for the Christian shall be the second coming or a civil war. Time has gone by so far. That even a civil war shall fail. As the Christian shall be attacked when they are isolated within their own homes.  Divide and conquer.
----------------------
Pentatonics. Two members of this group are actively promoting the LGBT community as well as openly gay. They released two CD's and had airtime on Christian radio stations. One CD was titled "PTXmas". A title which dismisses Christ and promotes self. .
=====================
This is prophecy in which all of Christianity loses in the modern world system. 
==============================
At the top right of my blogger page is a donate button for PayPal. If you liked this blog, were inspired from it. Please help me out with just a little something.  Anything is greatly appreciated and welcomed.  
============================== 

========================
  “Musings of an American Truck Driver”:
http://www.amazon.com/books/dp/0985310308
http://www.amazon.com/books/dp/1477629769
===================