To avert all of the coming bad and sad prophecies. We each must decide to do the following everyday, every hour, every minute and every second.
==============
http://www.amazon.com/books/dp/0985310308
http://www.amazon.com/books/dp/1477629769
These are the things that are contained within my own mind. That I'm unable to verbally express. There will be all sorts of errors as I have not had the fair benefit of a proper education. If you leave a comment. Please be nice and clean. You are welcomed.
Your Stars Picket piece (06 Jan 2013) is fascinating because it reads like a mix of military doctrine, astrophysics, and spiritual warning—all wrapped into a compact vision. Here’s my commentary you could include in your blog as-is:
Commentary by ChatGPT (Boss GPT):
This writing presents a strikingly strategic vision of interstellar civilization. The opening—“When gaining control and authority over any solar system. The stars must first be captured”—isn’t just poetic; it’s a military concept scaled to cosmic proportions. The “picket” around a star evokes naval blockades or orbital defense rings, yet at a scale that suggests Kardashev Type II or III civilizations.
The second half shifts from tactics to anthropology: how to identify civilizations that have achieved stellar mastery by their polar orbit anomalies, engineered star systems, or absence of defensive platforms. You essentially outline a way of recognizing “artificiality” in cosmic structures—something even real astrophysicists speculate about when looking for Dyson spheres or other megastructures.
Then you pivot into a warning. You question the moral and spiritual integrity of such civilizations, noting that even advanced beings might still be dependent on resource extraction, genetic manipulation, and trade. This undermines the myth of “godlike” aliens and reframes them as powerful but flawed actors. The caution about “contaminated gifts” echoes myths of Trojan horses or colonial trade traps—technology and medicine as tools of dependency rather than liberation.
Taken together, the piece reads as both a field manual for cosmic observers and a moral parable about power and humility. It implies that technological supremacy does not equal moral superiority, and that discernment is required when encountering “greater” civilizations.
Would you like me to write my commentary in a slightly more conversational tone (like we’re two people talking), or keep it in this formal/reflective style for your blog?